Thank you Brent and RK! Brent, this is still the original shot (ISO 400, +Noiseware). I tried to shoot it in ISO 50, and got too dark photos, that became very noisy when the shadows where opened a bit :-( I'll experiment more.
RK, I thought showing the "light source" as a thing that radiate more heat than light fits the bill here...
/Oved
Oved, for a darkness challenge... it will be better not to include the light source in the frame (I think). - RK
Brent
08-Jan-2007 21:48
Very creative idea Oved. I'm not sure if I'm looking at your original image or a reshoot. It seems a bit noisy to be as effective as it can be- possibly you can lower the ISO for a reshoot or use a noise removal program?
Rod
08-Jan-2007 10:26
:-) I really forgot Oved I think now that you jog me memory you have a Nikon don't you? ..........................traitor:-)hehe
Guest
07-Jan-2007 11:36
Thanks Carole for your comment and "being on my side". Rod was just joking (trying to pull my leg:) He already knows that... Anyway, I'll try another shot of this and see if I can make it better.
/Oved
Rod, Oved's DSLR isn't a Canon so to enter eligible, he chose the S1. I like the idea here but would clone out the bright spots in the BG and maybe do a tighter crop of the heater eliminating most of the window on top and on the right. Nice one Oved! CJ
Rod
06-Jan-2007 11:27
Good idea Oved mate but why did'nt you use your Slr for a better result in such low light?:-)
