photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Seventy: How to use super wideangle lenses effectively > Red Snapper, Fort Bragg, California, 2009
previous | next
15-JUN-2009

Red Snapper, Fort Bragg, California, 2009

Once again, I move in very closely with a 14mm super wideangle lens, this time making a grotesque portrait of a pile of red snapper being unloaded from the freezers of a fishing trawler in Fort Bragg’s harbor. The slight tilt of the lens allows me to deliberately distort the size of the heads closest to the lens at the bottom of the frame. The unseeing eyes bulging from the fiery red bodies are enormous, offering us a vision of hell itself. The focal point of the image, however, is the expression on the head partly obscured by a tail. The eye is glazed over, and the gaping mouth seems to scream at us. The ultimate incongruity: as hellish as this scene may seem, these fish have been harvested to bring profits to an industry, and pleasure to those who delight in eating red snapper.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1
1/320s f/6.3 at 7.0mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis31-Jul-2009 02:27
Glad this image has you thinking, Vera. And yes, it would be an amazing abstraction in black and white, but in doing so, my intended point -- a trip into hell -- would be lost. It's the red that makes it so hellish.
Guest 24-Jul-2009 01:55
Wow, I never would have thought to use a wide angle lens to take a photo so close like this. It has tremendous impact, causing me to wonder what other objects could be photographed in a similar manner. If this were done in black and white I think it might make an interesting abstract sort of image. It certainly has me thinking.
Phil Douglis07-Jul-2009 16:26
I intended this image to be hellish, and I am glad you find it revolting, in the best sense of that word. I am glad that this image has encouraged you to experiment at closer range with your own wideangle lens, Azlin.
Azlin Ahmad07-Jul-2009 13:32
This is a revolting picture, and I mean that as a compliment.
I rarely use wide angles lenses for still life such as these, and this photo has given me some new ideas to experiment with.
Phil Douglis05-Jul-2009 20:25
Yes, Rusty -- a good photograph (meaning expressive) should activate the emotions, intellect, and imagination of the viewer. If this image makes you queasy, I guess it succeeds.
russellt05-Jul-2009 16:18
baaarf... an emotional response which is after all a touchstone for a good photograph.
Phil Douglis04-Jul-2009 23:26
It is not really a fish eye lens, Rose. A fisheye lens, like a fish's eye, sees the world in circular fashion. All my lens does is to stretch the scene, and it is that stretching here that gives the image its queasy quality.
sunlightpix04-Jul-2009 22:59
Using a fisheye lens on fish eyes. Uggh! The distortion makes me queasy.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment