photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
ctfchallenge | all galleries >> Challenge 104 - Windows and Doors >> C104 - Exhibition > 9th - tie
Tidy*
by db.
previous | next
2002 db.

9th - tie
Tidy*
by db.

Ste-Ursanne, Switzerland

Canon PowerShot G2
1/250s f/5.6 at 12.5mm hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time24-Jul-2002 14:44:44
MakeCanon
ModelPowerShot G2
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length12.5 mm
Exposure Time1/250 sec
Aperturef/5.6
ISO Equivalent
Exposure Bias
White Balance (-1)
Metering Modematrix (5)
JPEG Quality (6)
Exposure Programaperture priority (3)
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
ctfchallenge10-Apr-2006 10:11
"Drug" or "drag": anyway, the link you provide is very useful, indeed. Many thanks for sharing! -- db.
Guest 09-Apr-2006 23:02
Aha! This link sums up the differences quite nicely:http://www.usd.edu/trio/tut/ps/transform2/ (not sure about the use of 'drug' as past tense of 'drag' ;o) ) - for just doing a bit of straightening they are pretty much the same...
Canon DSLR Challenge09-Apr-2006 15:20
Thank you, HT: yes, I enjoy the contrast between this picture and the next as well. And I feel somewhat at home at both places... (loving the “best” of each one) -- db.
Guest 08-Apr-2006 12:18
wonderful place to be
ctfchallenge06-Apr-2006 06:21
I'm afraid, Ric, you got me there...: the "skew" and the "distort" tools are to be found at the same place (edit > transform). I had a look at the one you use but could not see--at first glance--what the difference is. Anyone?? -- db.
Canon DSLR Challenge04-Apr-2006 15:56
The title is just for the challenge, Techo: I was looking for one single--short and eye-catching--word. Thanks a lot for your taking the time to comment, to give your opinion and state the reasoning behind it! -- db.
ctfchallenge03-Apr-2006 19:32
I like this one a lot. Must admit my first thought was , crop out the yellow facade on the left but after looking at it again, I would leave the crop as it. For the pic to focus on what the title is telling us I'd crop, but without titling and to portray the vision you wanted to show, leave it. Either way I do like this one.

-Techo
ctfchallenge02-Apr-2006 22:20
Thanks, Ric; and, yes: cropping in PS after using the "distort"-tool to get all vertical lines vertical and all horizontal ones horizontal... (Sounds logical, I know, but it isn't always easy.) -- db.
Guest 02-Apr-2006 20:07
Great picture - I love the pixel precise cropping - and possibly squaring up in Photoshop?
ctfchallenge31-Mar-2006 19:23
I'm looking forward to receiving more opinions on that. Many thanks, Mary Anne, for coming back here! -- db.
ctfchallenge31-Mar-2006 19:21
Daniel, I think this is definitely better than showing just the one building, but I haven't decided whether it would be better to show more of the yellow building. Let's see what other people say.
--Mary Anne
ctfchallenge31-Mar-2006 11:33
Thank you for commenting, Mary Anne! I did that framing on purpose with a goal in mind: not losing detail showing too much and, nevertheless, giving the idea of not showing just *one single* facade but a typical one for a whole street or even village. I may have failed in this attempt...? — db.
ctfchallenge31-Mar-2006 04:25
Wonderful colors here, Daniel, especially in the windowboxes. However, I'm not so sure about how/where the right side is cropped. It feels as if you need to show at least part of the windows on the yellow house, but I guess that's just a matter of personal preference.
--Mary Anne
ctfchallenge31-Mar-2006 03:28
Thanks a lot, Billy: you’ve been really fast! I just had uploaded the three images, and there was already your comment. Thanks! — db.
billy webb31-Mar-2006 03:15
Grreat compostion! Idealic for the topic too!