Come now chaps, you are lowering yourselves to the level of that Frenchman with such language ! Counter it, if you feel that way by all means, but do not sink to the use of his grammar
Tim Sparks
15-Oct-2006 20:45
hey guest, if you can't say anything positive or complimentary then shut the f*** up.
Jez Marren
13-Oct-2006 08:42
She not only looks the part but also looks a more realistic age than 80% of those concerned
Tim Sparks
12-Oct-2006 21:31
was the guest on the trip?
Guest
19-Sep-2006 08:55
she looks 13 ! Women would have been about 35 miles back !
T. Bowers
18-Sep-2006 22:24
Say what you will, but these gals were right there in the muck and mud and rain and sun just like we were. I agree they'dve been alot farther back in the real war but I give them my personal hats off for carrying on for a long rough trip
Guest
18-Sep-2006 19:20
nope. She certainly does not look 11!
Guest
17-Sep-2006 21:30
Guest i suggest you do your research as this WAAC is in fact a member of the ANC hence the nurses cadeuceus devices on the lapels......
She is actually a representative of the 50th Field Hospital NOT recon troops
CB again
17-Sep-2006 14:42
So you wouldn't have her along then? :)
Guest
11-Sep-2006 12:40
This WAAC looks about 11 years of age, how many reconaissance troopers in WW2 took their daughter's into combat with them, I think this badly spoils this