Again, why use language like that Frenchman and sink to his level, there has been plenty of nice and constructive comments on these photos here, as well as critisism, and everyone is entitled to his or her opinion
Tim Sparks
14-Oct-2006 22:19
The guest got one thing right, very pretty, its a shame the outstanding effort was ruined, not by the presence of women (who were virtually all wearing origonal kit unlike alot of the male counterparts who were wearing repro kit), but by D***heads and their unconstructive comments.
Jez Marren
13-Oct-2006 08:39
For your information all the nurses were ANC not WAAC - do your homework mr. expert, WAAC also became WAC in '42 so again, this was '44 portrayal; hair is correctly worn under correct headgear with a few loose at the side which having worn an m1 steel pot all day in the jeep is understandable; keep your negative anonymous to yourself please especially when you can't even get details correct
T.D man
19-Sep-2006 09:02
I agree with the guest, outstanding effort ruined by the presence of women, however
they are dressed and what ever they represent in the field with a armored recon outfit
CB again
17-Sep-2006 14:45
I refer the gentleman to the answer I gave earlier
Guest
11-Sep-2006 12:39
very pretty I admit, but her hairstyle looks more suited to a New York bar and once again, how many WAAC nurses were with a Reconaissance unit ?
