photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
MXP | profile | all galleries >> Galleries >> velvia_and_dslr tree view | thumbnails | slideshow
Tabert_Velvia_full.jpg
Tabert_Velvia_full.jpg		 Tabert1_DSLR_full.jpg
Tabert1_DSLR_full.jpg		 Tabert_crop_Velvia100F.jpg
Tabert_crop_Velvia100F.jpg		 Tabert1_crop_8MP_DSLR.jpg
Tabert1_crop_8MP_DSLR.jpg
Tabert_crop_velvia.jpg
Tabert_crop_velvia.jpg		 Tabert1_crop_DSLR.jpg
Tabert1_crop_DSLR.jpg

comment | share
Guest 27-Jul-2008 05:16
My eyes prefer the lush, round, smooth Velvia. The digital hurts my eyes.
Guest 12-Mar-2006 05:15
Thanks for posting this. Very cool to see real life examples!
MXP10-Mar-2006 22:20
Polarizer was probably not used on DSLR. It was same time of the day but light changes very fast. Hood was used on both. Don't think lens quality was an issue (28-70/2.8 L-lens against an AIS 50/1.8).
Guest 08-Mar-2006 14:24
The difference factors are
1. Use of polarizer. Polarizer was not used on DSLR, affecting EV and contrast esp. on those window panels.
2. Slightly different time of the day. Different lighting condition. DIfferent EV. The DSLR one has higher EV than Velvia one, toning down the contrast.
3. May be the lens quality was not on par.
4. Was hood used on both? It seems that with DSLR hood was not used.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
click on thumbnails for full image