photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
David Mingay | all galleries >> Mynd Dagsins '15 >> Photo of the Day 2005 > Apr 20: Click-zzz-click II
previous | next
20-APR-2005 David Mingay

Apr 20: Click-zzz-click II

Mike demonstrating the click-zzz-click of the newly serviced Rollei. If you look closely, you'll see the aperture blades set at f8!

I’ve printed yesterday’s picture 10”x10” on a sheet of A3 (11.7”x16”) semi gloss paper. It looks fantastic. My medium format workflow is complete. I’m getting to grips with the camera, improved my (chemical) development technique, the scanner is working and I’m finally getting a good understanding of printing black & white on the inkjet. I’m really pleased with that print. So what’s the big deal? Why bother when a more modern camera makes it all (apart from the printing) so easy? well, modern cameras with all their automation flatter their owners. It’s easy to get a good picture from a modern camera. Point and click. You press the button, someone else does the rest, to paraphrase an old Kodak slogan. That some people can’t even get decent picture from one of these modern miracles amazes me - no names, but take a look at the number of people complaining about their cameras on dpreview... Of course to get the best out of any camera takes a bit of skill, but with a modern digicam, you start from a position where the camera will usually get the focus and exposure more or less right. You’re half way there. With the Rolleicord, you start from nothing. Every decision is yours. Get something wrong, and it’s you that messed up. No one to blame but yourself. If you do your own processing, there’s plenty more ways to mess that up too. Take my Golden Gate picture for example. I messed up twice. It’s far too grainy from under exposure and there’s streaks in the sky from my poor, but now corrected, developing technique. I still got a picture, but not as good as I wanted. It looks OK on the web but a 10x10 print looks dreadful. So, why not use a modern automatic camera? I could have a nice print on the wall, but then, wouldn’t I also have to pass on any compliments to someone like Sony?

But hold on, don’t I usually use a DSLR which I ‘proudly’ shoot in jpg mode? Why not shoot in raw if I want to make things difficult? Remember what I said about making decisions? I prefer to make them when I make the exposure. Endlessly fiddling about in a raw converter or PS trying to decide if you’ve got ‘the best’ conversion possible isn’t what I call fun. Getting it right ‘in-camera’ is a real skill, a skill that the great photographers of the 20th century had to master. Think you’re a pretty neat photographer? So prove it. Go out with an all manual camera, a hand held meter and a roll of black and white film. Come home and develop it in the kitchen sink. Print your favourite shot - a good inkjet print, a lab print or for maximum effect print it yourself in your home darkroom, then hang it on the wall. Feel that sense of pride? My point exactly!


other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
Michael Todd Thorpe23-Apr-2005 03:09
I have to second what Robin and Linda said here. And I agree with what you've said here, too. Most of the great photos of the last century were taken by people who understood technique. Sometimes we forget that there was a time when the photographer stood there with a camera on a tripod and removed the lense cover to expose the film, there was no shutter. And if you were shooting people, they had to hold absolutely still or they'd ruin the shot. During the Civil War here in the states, Mathew Brady and his crew hauled their gear and their darkroom in a horse-drawn wagon. They took some awesome photographs, and nothing automatic. (And here I was proud of my 'manual' K1000!)
Linda Alstead21-Apr-2005 18:56
You don't even need to go as far as DPReview to see examples of people using 'idiot-proof' cameras who can't get an in-focus shot. Just take a look around pbase and see countless examples of people with 10Ds and 20Ds who can't get a decent shot! On the other hand of course, you can see people with crappy cameras taking wonderful, expressive shots too.
Robin Reid21-Apr-2005 17:28
You, Sir, are indeed a purist. And your comments here are indeed provocative! Maybe I will put some film in my old Canon, but will eschew the develop it myself phase.

Actually, if you can stand another compliment, your DSLR images show the care and thought you put into them and are certainly above "standard."

I'll always keep you on my favorites list as long as I'm doing PaD, because I learn from you and you set an excellent standard!
Gary Kimberley21-Apr-2005 12:46
Looks more like f11 to me are you sure?
Si Kirk21-Apr-2005 11:28
Spot on Dave i cannot agree more even on my DSLR i shoot full manual and RAW for the best results, i feel i made the photo.
Love the print i will be doing my own film this year as well cant wait!
Ken Zimmerman 21-Apr-2005 11:03
How right! I learned photography back inthe '60s and I was pissed when they came out with "Auto" modes!

Thanks for the long explaination, I'm going to get out my Rollie and see if I remember how to load it!