photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Nine: Composition -- putting it together > Storm’s End, Point Loma Harbor, San Diego, California, 2004
previous | next
17-APR-2004

Storm’s End, Point Loma Harbor, San Diego, California, 2004

Seagulls are common subjects in travel photography. To make an uncommon picture of one, I’ve used backlighting to abstract the bird and the roof it is perched upon. When abstracted, the shapes of both roof and bird can speak to us without distraction, and more easily guide the eye through the picture. I included the rooftop rod at left because it is higher than the gull, and leads us down to it. I shot this gull many times, hoping to get its beak in this exact position. The shape of the beak echoes the pointed shape of the roof shingle just to the right of it. Five more tiles gradually lead us down and out of the picture.
The huge cloud behind the gull offers a visual counterpoint to the mass of the roof. Between the cloud and the roof, we see clear sky. This is called “negative space.” Negative space often helps us organize our pictures. In this case, it creates a light gray wedge that points directly to the gull, the subject of the photograph-.

Leica Digilux 2
1/640s f/9.5 at 22.5mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis09-Oct-2005 16:52
Thanks, Lisbeth, for your comment. Yes, I did slightly rotate my camera when framing this scene to angle the picture slightly towards the right, and stress the flow of the roof into the lower right hand corner. Good eye!
Lisbeth Landstrøm09-Oct-2005 16:43
Another thing that I think adds to "the order" of this picture is the slightly rotated - and right angled - frame created by the rod and the roof. To me this rotated frame around the seagull gives a dynamic effect.
Alberto Quintal 22-Jun-2005 23:04
Beautiful picture, great catch!!!
Phil Douglis27-Feb-2005 03:16
Thanks, Jen, for this comment and your questions about negative space. Actually, there is nothing particularly mysterious about negative space. It is the space that exists around and between the subject matter in our pictures. The stuff we don't pay a lot of attention to. To many, it is just there. But a careful photographer will use negative space to create tension, to outline the subject and thereby avoid mergers that can harm coherence, and to allow the subject room to "walk into" and "walk out of" if need be. In other words, we should always be conscious of negative space as a potential source of meaning and as a means of simplifying and clarifying our images. And yes, I will be glad to point out examples of effective negative space in your own galleries when I get a chance to do so. Thanks again for this excellent comment, Jen.
Jennifer Zhou01-Feb-2005 06:00
Dear Phil,

I was drawed by the geometric shapes of this picture. The use of the sihouette and that heavy piece of cloud well abstract the picture. The seagull is standing in between, between brightness and darkness. The storm is end, then the sun is coming out. Just in this moment, this two opposite things met in a perfect sitting. What I benefit the most from this picture is the"negative space", never heard of it before but thought it is quite interesting, so I searched on the internet to know more about it, as far as I know now it is acutally a drawing technique that can also help to improve composition. You are here applying it in your photo. And that made a very well organized photograph. If you have time Phil, could you come to pick some examples of "negative space" in my gallery, did they help or hurt the pictures?

Thank you very much!

Jen
Phil Douglis17-May-2004 21:21
Thanks, Steve. As I pointed out in my own comments on this photograph, negative space plays a key role in organizing the picture. It is not easy to change your "form/field" vision -- it's easy to fall into the trap of just looking at the subject itself and its surroundings. But you must also study the flow of "negative' space around and between your subjects, because that can make or break your image. It can pull it all together, as it does here, or it can draw the eye away from the subject and fragment the image. When evaluating the photographs of others, the first thing I look at is the way negative space is handled. Does it help or does it it hurt? Is it defined purposefully or by accident? The answers to these questions often decide whether the image succeeds or fails to express its idea effectively.
Steve Martin17-May-2004 17:07
Phil... I'm most definitely drawn into this photo. I love the highlighted "negative space" behind the sillhouetted gull as well as how the rooline and cloud formation form a "Y". I'm attracted to symmetry and lines in my subjects. I aspire to producing images such as this (but fall short all too often!).
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment