photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Thirteen: Bringing Fresh Visions to Tired Clichés > Gargoyle, Villa Montezuma, San Diego, California, 2004
previous | next
18-APR-2004

Gargoyle, Villa Montezuma, San Diego, California, 2004

I also see numerous clichés involving buildings in travel photos. Most of them are shot from a distance so as to embrace the entire structure, and are descriptive, rather than expressive, in nature. When I approach a building as a subject for a photograph, I look for details that make it unique, and then try to stress those details rather than describe the entire structure. San Diego’s bizarre Villa Montezuma was built in the 19th Century as the whimsically eccentric home of musician/artist Jesse Shephard. Now owned by the San Diego Historical Society, you can see an image of the entire house on its website at: http://www.sandiegohistory.org/mainpages/locate5.htm
Note the difference between the website’s overall view of the house and my own interpretation here. With the help of a short telephoto lens, I was able to build an image around a solitary gargoyle on one corner of the house, using the weather vane and turret as context. More than any other detail, that gargoyle captures the essence of the Victorian era. There are many other strikingly incongruous Victorian touches inside the house, but interior photography is not allowed, so this gargoyle will have to say it all.

Leica Digilux 2
1/500s f/6.7 at 22.5mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis27-Jul-2004 16:24
Interesting response, Anna. You thought it was an angel because you wanted it to be an angel. Then you looked at it closely and discovered a sea serpent. Actually it is neither -- it's a dragon. In fact, you had already seen that dragon, and commented on it, at:http://www.pbase.com/image/28254094!
Phil Douglis27-Jul-2004 16:20
You are correct on two counts, Anna. I was watching the clouds carefully -- not just the clouds themselves, but the spaces between the clouds as well. When the gargoyles head was framed within that blue space between the clouds, i shot -- it creates tension, and helps make the gargoyle a focal point. And yes, I did choose this angle to bring the gargoyle and "angel" together -- although that is not an angel -- it's a dragon!
Anna Yu27-Jul-2004 03:49
Whoops it wasn't an angel, a sea serpant I mean.
Anna Yu27-Jul-2004 03:48
Yes it's annoying when they don't allow photography. Most of the time I like pictures of details like this, rather than the whole building too. Maybe because of the lack of a good WA lens :-) I'm trying to guess whether you were waiting for an interesting cloud to float by? You chose this angle in order to get in the gargoyle and the angel together, right? What an interesting house, out of Hitchcock.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment