photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Four: Finding meaning in details > Chained monument, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 2003
previous | next
21-MAR-2003

Chained monument, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 2003

In the center of Santa Fe's historic Plaza, the monument to those who fought in the New Mexico's Indian Wars now must be padlocked to protect it from vandalism. Instead of photographing the entire monument, I chose to picture only the parts that carried the most meaning. I moved close enough to stress the contrast between the silver chain and the green fence, making sure to capture individual drops of water -- residue of a recent rain. I am also close enough to depict engraving on the monument which adds context -- it talks of heros who have died fighting Indians. My search for detail also reveals that the original wording has been edited with a chisel. A derogatory reference to those Indians is now gone, but its scar remains. The watery surface of the fence seems to weep -- a sad commentary on a tragic era.

Canon PowerShot G2
1/200s f/4.0 at 21.0mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis02-Aug-2005 17:16
What a wonderful interpretation of this image, Zandra! An arranged marriage, chained together by forces beyond their control. I made this image as a comment on the painful history that exists between the government of the United States of American and the native Americans who were driven out of their lands, force on to barren reservations, and required to live lives they did not choose for themselves. This monument honors the sacrifices of the American soldiers who fought and killed Indians here in New Mexico during the 19th Century. Today it must be padlocked to prevent symbolic retaliation from those who see this monument as commemorating an injustice. Without the context of this history, you see these symbols as a weeping testament to a forced marriage. No doubt there are many among the Native American community who may well agree with your view. Our government called it "Manifest Destiny" and assimilation. Indians, on the other hand, called it a form of genocide. The scars are still there. And that's why this monument must bear a padlock.
Guest 02-Aug-2005 14:04
Without knowing the history behind this image, this speeks to me of two individulas who are forced together against there will. It could be an arranged marriage where both partied has been forced together and are held together by that outer force, family and tradition. The water becomes the tears and the sweet that witnes about the endurance they have to live with. The pointy shape empowers the feeling of hostility, towards eachother or towards the family and traditions. By the sides, more then the chain, which may very well be the bond between the two, one can see the guard which forces the pair, the couple to stay witin the frame. No place to escape...Indeed a political image
Phil Douglis25-Apr-2005 18:06
Thanks for pointing this out, Eloise. The repetition of the circles and points create a rhythmic pattern that contrasts to the tightly bunched chain. We have a double contrast here -- the contrast in color, that I pointed out in my caption, and this compositional contrast that you are seeing. Because of these contrasts, the chain becomes isolated, providing the focal point of the image, and the most symbolically expressive thing in it.
Eloise 25-Apr-2005 14:58
The repetition of the circles in the gate and the points at the top isolate the chain creating a theme of in a way ‘being trapped?' or am I totally wrong in thinking this?
Phil Douglis14-Dec-2004 21:25
You perceive the ironies here, Clara. And it is those small details that make those ironies sink in.
Guest 14-Dec-2004 20:41
Following the series of war artifacts and memories, I find this one very sharp: you can not trespass to watch the heroes memorial. Is is like they are isolated from the people they served and loved? Or is that they did not serve for them? Yes, the fence is to avoid vandalism. What's its origin? Power building fences.
Phil Douglis10-Dec-2003 00:21
I admit to expressing a political point of view in this photo, Tim. The irony of locking up a monument to protect it from those who would use it to express their own beliefs, was too powerful for me to ignore. Thanks, Tim, for pointing out the additional symbolism -- I am moved by your interpretation.

Phil
Tim May09-Dec-2003 23:36
Your images aren't often so overtly political - but wow - this is such a powerful image for the reasons you describe in your caption. To me it seems so timely to remember our history while we are creating yet another set of enemies. The spikes, to me, signify the way historic events will capture us again, and again, until we learn from them.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment