photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Gabriele Willig | profile | all galleries >> camera and lens test pictures >> lens test pictures >> PENTAX SMC FA 80-320 mm tree view | thumbnails | slideshow

PENTAX SMC FA 80-320 mm

sleepy
sleepy		 caring
caring		 standing still
standing still		 hiding
hiding

comment | share
Gabriele Willig19-Nov-2004 19:32
Hi Irving,
Thanks for your feedback in two of my galleries ... you can continue like that ;-).
I would start with your last question. I have used the *ist D for almost exactly one year now and I am still absolutely happy with it. I own a MZ-5N also and like you, I had some Pentax lenses and when the *ist D was launched in Germany in October 2003, I bought it immediately. After one year of intensive use, I would buy it again without hesitating.
The second question concerning the 16-45 mm lens: it is one of my best ones (and I have a lot). It is sharp, contrasty and gives a superb image quality, especially when stopped down a bit.
In my opinion there are no sharpness issues with the *ist D. I have set the in-camera sharpness from normal to high and I am very satisfied with the results. I usually add a little bit of Photoshop Unsharp Mask to my pictures and obtain crisp results, always depending, of course, on the lenses I use. Like many other *ist D users, I like to work with not oversharpened camera RAW data and adjust them in Photoshop as I want. But that is my opinion.
I have spent a lot of money during the past year and have obtained some very good Pentax primes, such as for instance the SMC F* 300 mm/4.5 which in my opinion is unbeatable and which I like most. My two other favorites are the SMC A* 135 mm/1.8 and the SMC A* 85 mm/1.4. Having bought these lenses new worlds opened for my *ist D and me.
As concerns nature photography and flying birds: I recently bought the Sigma EX 70-200 mm/2.8 APO (and the Sigma 1.4 EX converter), a highly recommended lens. I have not yet had the time to test it that much but I saw pictures of flying birds taken with this combo *ist D/Sigma 70-200 mm which were simply astonishing. If I find one of those impressing pictures, I will send you the link to your mail address.
I hope this was of help to you. In case that you have any further questions, please contact me here or on my mail address. Always welcome to meet *ist D companions around.
Best regards,
Gaby.
Irving Buckleman 18-Nov-2004 15:46
Your photography in this gallery and others is very impressive,sensitive and beautiful. I am preparing to buy my first digital SLR next month and since I already own a Oentax MZ-S and several lenses the Pentax ist-d seems to be the logical choice. I would like to know a few things before I buy. The reviews have said there are sharpness problems with this camera. Do you find that you have to use in camera or computer sharpening. I like to do nature photography and my MZ-S has trouble focusing on rapidly moving subjects like flying birds. Is this a problem on the ist-d? Are you happy with the 16-45 lens? and finally after using the ist-d for a while are you still happy with this camere? Thanks again for the beautiful phographs
Gabriele Willig18-Sep-2004 13:47
Hello Lars,
Thank you for your message. You will indeed not be disappointed with the 80-320 mm.
I had it already on my analog MZ-5N and liked it a lot. Together with the *ist D, it also works fine. I have never regretted having bought that lens.
Gaby.
Guest 17-Sep-2004 07:48
Thanks for sharing these images! Great shots, and I'm considering the 80-320 myself, and from your work I see that i won't be disappointed. Also loved your other galleries!
click on thumbnails for full image