Lapse into Darkness by ctfchallenge

ctfchallenge | all galleries >> Challenge 147 - Change >> Challenge 147 - Eligible > Lapse into Darkness


22-NOV-2007	Brent

Canon EOS 30D ,Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
1/5000s f/5.6 at 17.0mm iso100 hide exif

other sizes: small medium original auto

Please do not delete, update, or otherwise edit others' entries
* Submitter retains all copyrights *

comment |

ctfchallenge		03-Dec-2007 06:22
Thanks Charlie and CJ :-) ~Brent

ctfchallenge		02-Dec-2007 17:41
Good exposure on a very relaxing image Brent - wish I was there! :-) CJ

Charlie Beck		26-Nov-2007 20:19
Looks like you got the perfect time of day on this one. I love the deep blue remaining in the sky and the more subtle blue still evident in the water.

ctfchallenge		24-Nov-2007 04:27
Thanks B.C., Jano and Doug. I haven't used the polarizing filter here yet Rod. It does a nice effect I like, but I used it a lot last year on another island here and regretted a little using it so much as many shots looked the same. Still, I did some shooting today (haven't gone over them yet) where I think using the CP would have been nice- they are a good thing to have in your bag I think. ~Brent

ctfchallenge		24-Nov-2007 03:13
Great working keeping the sun Brent. Like many, I would have likely lost the sun or underexposed. -COAmature

Rod		24-Nov-2007 01:53
Brent did you use a polarize filter? I might think about on for the L lens.

ctfchallenge		24-Nov-2007 01:39
Great job Brent - I like the color and WB here. Very serene. jano

ctfchallenge		23-Nov-2007 22:59
a very dramatic capture of some tricky changing light. hmmm.. a vacation about now sounds nice :) hope you're having a great one - b.c.

ctfchallenge		23-Nov-2007 19:39
Sounds like you have a much more scientific shooting manner than me Rod- that yields great results. I have to bank on being able to get thinks right later on (with luck) processing the RAW files. The dogs are being watched by a nice young couple staying at the house while we are away. I'm sure they are being spoiled and it is only for 5 nights too. We do miss them though. ~Brent

Rod		23-Nov-2007 19:15
My camera is set on parameter 2 Tommy for less sharpening, contrast & saturation in camera. The picys don't look as good from the camera but Photoshop does these jobs better. In PS I normally use the curves tool & make a small S shape curve with the line, this seems to add contrast & bump the colours up a bit (looks similar to using the Brightness & Contrast tool set on minus 8 brightness & plus 8 contrast). Then Unsharp Mask, 150....point 3......0 on the high res picy & after downsizing another Unsharp Mask of about 100 or 150.....point 3....0. & a bit of dodge & burn if needed. Brent who's looking after your dogs?

ctfchallenge		23-Nov-2007 17:59
I don't know about any custom setting Rod would use Tommy; it might only work if you drink at least 3 beers ;-) I know...Rod is only joking about the beer while he is really drinking tea. I don't have any magic setting on my rig, my "M" button is usually left on a setting good for macro images at work. Most of the time a just vary things in AV mode depending on the setting and muck with the exposure compensation a bit- but fine tune it in RAW. As far as barrel distortion goes with this lens; I find very little using my cropped body, but expect it would be different on a full frame. I'm curious to see how this looks on something other than my lappy screen here on vacation, it is supposed to be a good screen as far as portables go (LED backlighting), but I've noticed it doesn't quite display all the color range my desktop monitor does. ~Brent

ctfchallenge		23-Nov-2007 13:26
Brent, how's the barrel distortion? Looks good so far otherwise. Good idea and beautiful execution. Do you have a custom "Brent" setting in your camera. Once in a while I try to imitate it but can't seem to find it... or Rod's either. -tv

ctfchallenge		23-Nov-2007 09:15
Thanks Rod :-) I really like my 17-40 lens. On my cropped sensor I find the range quite acceptable for a walk around lens and use it for probably 80% of my shots. You can't get great bokeh with just an f4, but at least it holds f4 throughout the zoom range. I think it's a pretty sharp lens and being on the lighter side and one of the least expensive L lenses makes it appealing to me as well. I give it a thumbs up.

Rod		23-Nov-2007 08:27
Wot an excellent picy, the exposure is spot on for me. Is this lens any good Brent I'm thinking of getting one?

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment