photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
ctfchallenge | all galleries >> Challenge 128 - Isolate >> Challenge 128 - Eligible > Fishing * 6th by Rod
previous | next
10-MAR-2007 Rod

Fishing * 6th by Rod

Moreton Bay Brissie Oz

Canon EOS 350D ,Canon EF 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6 II USM
1/3200s f/11.0 at 200.0mm iso100 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time10-Mar-2007 07:47:44
MakeCanon
ModelCanon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length200 mm
Exposure Time1/3200 sec
Aperturef/11
ISO Equivalent100
Exposure Bias
White Balance
Metering Modematrix (5)
JPEG Quality
Exposure Programprogram (1)
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
Rod 13-Mar-2007 08:01
I used the clone tool on a acute angle & I think it worked:-)
ctfchallenge12-Mar-2007 14:07
Yea, I see why you were trying to clone it out. Makes sense. I would try cloning in multiple small steps and defining a different source for each step, and also offset them by some distance (1/2") horizontally. That way even if the pattern repeats, its not going to be obvious beyond a small portion and over the full length of the line, it would be pretty much random visually.
-Cat
Rod 12-Mar-2007 07:49
Thanks Cat:-) I think I can see it too now. There was a line like a small wave just above the boat that I cloned as it didn't seem to look right ( it was in all 8 shots I took) but it might look better au natural than my cloning skills:-) Here it is without any cloning, no matter how small I make the clone brush as soon as I clone along the line it makes above & below look repetitious even though the the brush didn't do anything there. Very strange init:-)
Guest 11-Mar-2007 19:45
Wonderful end result Rod! Reminds me of one of a similar shots I had done:http://www.pbase.com/cslr_challenge/image/70892347
(*) Needs a little more perfection in the touched up areas. The repetition pattern is noticable.
-Cat
ctfchallenge11-Mar-2007 00:26
Thanks Carole, Lee, Bill & Blade:-) Well I'll be buggered, I really liked this shot but posted the bike shot thinking you would all say the subject is too small in this one. But after 20 posters told me the bike shot was off topic I put this one up. Wot's really pleasing about you liking this shot is Mereana wasn't so sure about it:-)hehe
She liked this rock pool better.

Rod
blademeister10-Mar-2007 18:57
I've gotta pile on with the accolades too. Great photograph for the contest.
ctfchallenge10-Mar-2007 15:49
This is just terrific Rod! Can't add any more praise than all that's been given - great shot! CJ
Bill Warren10-Mar-2007 15:04
What is unique and deserving about here is that the isolation subject is so small in size-relative to the framing. Unlike the rest of use, you have made the point without the isolation subject being dominant in size.
Canon DSLR Challenge10-Mar-2007 13:49
looks like a keeper.
thefly
Rod 10-Mar-2007 13:09
Thanks Aammm mate:-)
aam1234 10-Mar-2007 09:50
Really really like it. Good work mate.
Rod 10-Mar-2007 04:31
Thanks Christina, RK & Henry:-) I took a few shots in AV mode that looked ok on the camera lcd but I've been tricked before with highlights on the water looking good in review & really blown when I view them on the puter. So I set the mode to manual & underexposed by quite a few stops.
ctfchallenge10-Mar-2007 02:59
You nailed this one! - Henry
Squared C10-Mar-2007 02:59
This is wonderful Rod! And it seems perfect for the topic to me! Wonderful work!
ctfchallenge10-Mar-2007 02:58
Wow, Rod...dont know how you arrived at this...looks like a negative (from the film world) typically I would have expected the sky to be bright and the water surface to be darker with bits of reflection. This picture is inverse and I love it.
- RK