* thornless by ctfchallenge

ctfchallenge | all galleries >> Challenge 106 - "T" >> C106 - Eligible > * thornless


27-APR-2006	ArminB

I know, a bit post work applied, but not very much desaturation of the bg was necessary

Canon EOS 350D
1/200s f/5.0 at 62.0mm iso400 hide exif

other sizes: small medium original auto

Please do not delete, update, or otherwise edit others' entries
* Submitter retains all copyrights *

comment |

Britt		03-May-2006 15:20
Bugger off Rod....why do pretty shots annoy you so much? Hehehe I love it Armin!

Rod		02-May-2006 10:59
Why waste petrol in a mower when we have Photoshop:-) Why take picys when we have Photoshop:-)

arminb		02-May-2006 10:46
Composed to my liking? Well, would have loved to, but I had forgotten my lawn mowing machine to get rid of the green :o)

Rod		02-May-2006 09:34
Why didn't you see this when you took the shot? You could have then composed the shot to your liking instead of developing cliche post processing techniques. Didn't you like this in all B&W? At least then it would look like a real picy:-)

arminb		01-May-2006 14:21
Well, I'm not the biggest fan of the post thing as well, but in this case there was too much green in the upper right corner for my taste, it distracted they eye...a tighter crop would imho result in too much bold stone without depths...hm...what am I trying to explain here, I do not understand it either :)

Paul		01-May-2006 07:54
Great idea but bugger me i can't get into this post processing lark.

Rod		30-Apr-2006 23:27
Why was de saturation necessary Armin? I would imagine the flower on stone would show up ok, & be a proper picy.

ctfchallenge		30-Apr-2006 19:06
Beatiful. Great job with the PP. I like it! I can see how the title relates to the image, one would usually expect a rose in such a shot. The tulip, thus the title. -Techo :)

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment