photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
ctfchallenge | all galleries >> Challenge 106 - "T" >> C106 - Exhibition > Trinity*
previous | next
25-APR-2004 Endless Quest

Trinity*

The Church of the Holy Trinity, Dublin Ireland

Sony Cybershot
1/500s f/8.0 at 7.0mm iso100 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time
Make
Model
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length
Exposure Time
Aperture
ISO Equivalent
Exposure Bias
White Balance
Metering Mode
JPEG Quality
Exposure Program
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
Rod 01-May-2006 03:43
Of course we can disagree David, it would be a boring picy that everyone liked. But for me the most work should be done in the camera. We couldn't get such a cliche manipulated look such as this in camera but if Richard paid a visit to this church when the lighting was right he would have done far better than this monstrosity:-)
These effects are mostly just the click of a button that a two year old could do.
ctfchallenge30-Apr-2006 19:42
Thanks for the comment. I normally don`t put my sig in my photographs. I only do it if posting it on my own website. Since this is posted on my own website, the sig is in it. I have the original size photo, but that`s to big to post here. (I was a bit too lazy to resize it....) EQ
Britt 30-Apr-2006 14:21
I love the mood that this one has and I agree that without it, it might just be another shot of a pretty church. This is gorgeous. If you need your sig on the photo, make it almost transparent or watermark it - just my suggestion.
David29-Apr-2006 16:54
Open your eyes to a different world Rod, beyond the confines of just the what the lens sees. Yeah, there's post processing on this - and so what? I think it turns what might have otherwise been a mundane shot into something moody and atmospheric.

I guess you and I will never agree about PP though. Each to their own.

We do agree on the sig though. They ruin otherwise excellent photographs.

David.
Rod 29-Apr-2006 03:44
All I can see here is post processing Richard & the silly sig of course. I bet there's a good shot under all this make up.