photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
ctfchallenge | all galleries >> Challenge 188 - One Second Shot >> Challenge 188 - Eligible > 7th. Self Portrait
previous | next
26-JUN-2009 Maarten Mariën

7th. Self Portrait

Vancouver, BC, Canada


other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
ctfchallenge28-Jun-2009 23:42
Way to give all of us tunnel vision. What a unique setup. -Doug
ctfchallenge28-Jun-2009 14:56
Maarten, my congrats to your new lens, I have one myself and love it. Very creative picture and techically well done (may be I would like to see a bit more details on the camera).
As for many pictures in the challenge - not so much from "long exposure".
K
ctfchallenge28-Jun-2009 13:02
...and "Canon" gets into the picture, too! Nice one Maartin. shu
ctfchallenge28-Jun-2009 05:30
Now I understand, its levels in PS too and I use it but this helps me appreciate why I am using it and prob then use it better. Thanks - Debi
Guest 28-Jun-2009 03:29
Thanks Rod, tv and Debi!!

tv--Interesting suggestion of turning it back around, I honestly didn't think of that! :-) But after comparing both versions, I think I'll retain this one anyway. The other one isn't really a self portrait, and as such is all about (only about) the strange effect.

Debi--I'll try. On my original image the histogram was flat from 0-5%, meaning there were no almost black shades at all; it had a big bump between 5 and 35%, meaning there were a lot of rather dark shades; and was flat again from 35 to 100%, meaning there were no light shades at all. I simply used the histogram adjustment tool (called "Levels" in Aperture, I don't know about photoshop), put the leftmost slider to 5% and the rightmost one to 35%, so that in the resulting image, all the existing shades in the image would be distributed over 0 to 100% (pure black to pure white).

Come to think of it, I should have taken the picture with 2 seconds exposure instead of one, then I guess the shades would have been between 10 and 70% instead of 5-35%. Well anyway, it was already difficult enough as it was.
ctfchallenge27-Jun-2009 16:25
This is very creative thinking. Will you please explain the part about the histogram - about being between 5-35% and centred to 0-100% if its not too much of an effort? - Debi
ctfchallenge27-Jun-2009 14:59
Unusually creative macro image. I couldn't figure it out either. It has a surreal quality that might have been better in its original orientation with the center upside down. -tv
ctfchallenge27-Jun-2009 07:43
Rod
Very well done Maarten I haven't seen anything like this before. I thought you shot through a tube but using the image on the lens glass is very novel. Way to go mate.
ctfchallenge27-Jun-2009 03:34
Ah I understand the setup now and congrats on the new lens. I have one myself and love it. Well it sounds like you are going about things more scientifically than I do. I honestly don't mind the effect that much the "banding?" I see looks similar to what I have gotten myself when trying to raise the exposure on a RAW image that was shot with inadequate exposure. In my case it has been hard to get rid of but once in a while using a noise filter seems to help. Not really an issue here because what I see looks kind of "Ahrty" :-)
Guest 27-Jun-2009 02:59
Thanks Brent!

The setup: my camera was quite close to the mirror. Since I used my (brandnew ;-) macro lens, I could focus, at about 1:3 sensor size to image size ratio, on the reflection of the image inside the aperture (which was upside down; this is a 180 degrees turned image).

I'm not too sure what you mean with the exposure suggestion. The luminance histogram was almost everything between 5 and 35 percent; I centered that out to 0--100%, and passed it through a monochrome filter (NB: I've just updated from original version). No other processing. Noise reduction didn't have much effect. Interestingly, since the whole image was shot through quite some glass, the colour histograms showed a marked shift of about 5% left between Red, Green and Blue.
ctfchallenge27-Jun-2009 02:23
Very cool effect Maarten, I'm still trying to figure out how this was done. It almost gives it a canvas look with the banding but I wonder how it might look with exposure brought up less (hope you shot RAW) or possibly a pass through a noise filter?
~Brent