Guest		21-Mar-2006 18:24
Very cool illusion, elegant b&w. -Michael

Canon DSLR Challenge		15-Mar-2006 03:03
Yes, Bev Doolittle. I'm so bad at names. -- Victor

Guest		15-Mar-2006 02:05
Victor, do you mean Bev Doolittle? If so, yeah, it does kind of remind me of one of those. I really like this one, by the way.

Canon DSLR Challenge		12-Mar-2006 22:58
Bev Doolittle -

Canon DSLR Challenge		11-Mar-2006 04:33
I don't think it should be rotated. This reminds me of a series of photos of horses camouflaged on snowy rocks. Does anyone know what I'm referring to? -- Victor

Piotr Siejka		10-Mar-2006 23:52
Thanks for all the comments!!! Appreciate them... but I'm not tilting the image... that's how it was taken and I don't want it to be SO obvious... Cheers Pete

jimhwy		10-Mar-2006 19:55
I agree that the alien would be much easier to see if the photo was rotated 90 degrees CCW. But I'm not sure if it's best to do that. The way it is, I can see exactly what the photo really is which is nice. But but... gee, that's a tough call. Jim H.

Guest		10-Mar-2006 16:26
I remember seeing this image before. Loved it then, and I love it now. I agree that a rotation would be a good idea.

ctfchallenge		10-Mar-2006 15:40
Nice. Rotation will certainly help. -Cat

Canon DSLR Challenge		10-Mar-2006 15:05
Perfect example of finding something in nature. I agree with doctah it would be more dramatic if the viewer did not tilt their head to see the alien. Funny though, now that I've seen him/her I can't see rocks and a lake anymore! Cindy

Canon DSLR Challenge		10-Mar-2006 12:44
Have you thought about rotating it right 90°? -Doctah

ERROR: 500

NOTES: [hset] LOADING Redis is loading the dataset in memory, at /usr/local/share/perl5/Redis.pm line 268. ,

PBASE_ENV: production