Thank you *very* much--Olaf.dk, Mary Anne and Lydia--for your kind remarks! I have found yours, Olaf, especially interesting: it would never have occurred to me to make the difference between three voids and three "fulls"(?), though you, obviously, are absolutely right; one always learns from hearing/reading what others see in an image of yours. BTW: the Shadows/Highlights sliders in PhotoShop helped in this case a lot to "nail" (post factum) the exposure, Mary Anne and Olaf; nevertheless, the G2 was at the time a very capable little camera. -- db.
Very nice, Daniel. The exposure is perfect!
--Mary Anne
Guest
15-May-2009 21:17
Interesting. Three voids is a different, unexpected, take on the composition of three. You've managed the high contrast scene well with good detail from shadows to highlights - details that are an important part of the story, if not _the_ story.
