photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
David Mingay | all galleries >> Mynd Dagsins '15 >> Photo of the Day 2003 > Digital? Pah!
previous | next
01-DEC-2003

Digital? Pah!

102 years of photographic development separate this Kodak No.2 Brownie from the camera that took this photograph. This No.2, however is only 70 years old, made in Britain during the last couple of years of production. It still works - the film roll in the picture was taken last year, and it makes pretty good images considering just how basic the design was. It’s the camera for which Kodak developed the 120 roll film format - still the medium format standard today. You’d think it’d be worth something, but Kodak made 2,500,000 of the things up to 1924, so I’d guess that everyone has a No.2 Brownie somewhere in the attic. A quick look on eBay shows I’d be lucky to get £2 for it!

I’ve used several camera’s for PotD so far, including a Yashica Electro 35 rangefinder, Pentax MX and ME, Fuji 1400Z, Canon G2 and (Linda’s)G3, EOS 50E and 300D, but not this Brownie...

...yet!

Canon EOS 300D Digital Rebel
1/125s f/22.0 at 68.0mm iso800 full exif

other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
Ray :)26-Sep-2006 00:05
We often got these donated at the charity shop and we flogged them for a fiver!
Lara S21-Jan-2004 18:20
She's amazing. Only 2 pounds on Ebay? She's worth keeping though.
Jill02-Dec-2003 22:55
So that is how it is done..making notes that I just have to have extra equipement *grin*
I was given an old Kodak the type that one opens from the top and looks into a square shaped glass which is mirrored...this was given to me when I was a child by a stranger believe it or not...not appreciating what I had I traded it for an old Opal GT car. Hope you hang on this camera!
David Mingay02-Dec-2003 08:47
Thanks for the comments all. Here's how it was done. The background is white paper, and I used a single studio flash diffused with a reversed translucent brolly above and to the left of the taking camera. I needed f22 for depth of field, so selected an ISO that just overexposed the background, making it appear completely white. Because the subject is black, that remained correctly exposed.
Ron Lutz II02-Dec-2003 03:41
Very nice product shot and an interesting subject as well. I agree with the comments below, very nice lighting.
Guest 02-Dec-2003 03:11
Love how you have that perfect white background. What did you use? perfect lighting? Do you have professional lights?
Elizabeth Glass01-Dec-2003 19:34
Wow! The lighting is stunning. I feel like I can reach out and touch it. Awesome job!