file down site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only must be in a folder.

You should share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are the most apps that may be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. p2p 순위 It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.