file down site
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.

You must share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you must discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. 웹하드 순위 This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.