Webhard
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud must be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

웹하드 순위 When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.

You should share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you should find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.