![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Topics >> by >> the_15second_trick_for_alpc |
the_15second_trick_for_alpc Photos Topic maintained by (see all topics) |
||
The Best Guide To Book Review: An Atlas of Induced Sputum: An Aid for![]() Where 3rd party code was utilized, the version and a repository of that code must be stated and pointed out properly. Where brand-new code was developed for the execution of the study, then it ought to ideally be provided to the community via a suitable open repository, ideally at the time of paper submission. This declaration will appear in the Methods section of the paper and independently with your published article on Science, Direct details. For more details, go to the Data Declaration page. For The Latest Info Found Here about the editorial process (consisting of the status of manuscripts under review) or for technical support on submissions, please visit our Support Center. ![]() Such papers should lie within the journal's scope and pursue the greatest standards of development, significance, technical accuracy and reproducibility. For more details, see the journal home-page. Neuro, Image publishes review papers that resolve and manufacture research areas of outstanding current interest that lie within the scope of the journal. ![]() The smart Trick of KSU Library - Kennesaw State University That Nobody is Talking AboutIf you prepare to send a review, we encourage you to contact the Editor-in-Chief or a Senior Editor with the relevant competence, laying out the reasoning, planned scope and novelty of the proposed review, prior to submission. Evaluation documents need to supply an authoritative and vital perspective. Evaluation papers that are restricted to literature evaluations, without more comprehensive analysis and integration, are not likely to prosper in editorial or peer evaluation. ![]() This may include controversial styles of general importance to the neuroimaging community, or specific problems that relate to recently released papers in the journal. Such commentaries ought to be short (less than 1500 words), with a concise abstract (100 words), a short bio of pertinent referrals, and as much as 2 figures. Where there is no clear dispute of interest, the Authors of the target post might be welcomed to assess the submission for accurate errors and will normally be welcomed to release a quick (500 word) rejoinder. Authors submitting a commentary on a manuscript should use the protocol under "Submitting a commentary" when submitting their paper. |
||
|