Wren 03_27_06.jpg by Wm. Bates

Wm. Bates | all galleries >> Wildlife Gallery >> Small Bird Gallery > Wren 03_27_06.jpg


27-MAR-2006

Canon EOS 20D ,Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM
1/2500s f/4.0 at 420.0mm iso200 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto

DO NOT link, use, reproduce or alter this image or any part of this image Copyright held by Wm. Bates

comment |

Eric Hewis		01-Apr-2006 08:04
Until I saw your picture I'd always thought that the wren was native to Europe. A really nice picture

Dave Callahan Photography		29-Mar-2006 16:16
I guess the different backround is what does it.I was wondering why the dof was so different and didnt realize the backround wasnt the same ,Thanks for taking the time to answer,and when are you doing the self portrait thing again?You should make it a regular entry.A self portrait gallery?

Wm. Bates		29-Mar-2006 15:24
Dave, You asked "why are they different?" I am assuming you asked that question because the same camera and same lens were used for each shot. However, even though the images are of the same bird, each shot was taken by a different person, the bird was in a different spot with a different background, different lighting angles and the distance between the bird and the photographer was different in each shot as well. So that is why they look "different". I hope I answered all your questions. (warm smile) Wanda

Dave Callahan Photography		28-Mar-2006 18:48
Both shots are great but why are they different?

Guest		28-Mar-2006 04:53
WOW! this is an awesome shot well done! Cheers, Tom

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment