I have checked hundreds of SD-9 images on pbase.com andhttp://david.oldcolo.com/gallery and the pictures are amazing!!!! Nothing compare to them!
I have been looking for so nice pictures of SD-10, but I could not find even one!!!!
The SD-9 pictures are much,much better! Why? Because of the lack of microlenses?
The SD-10 should be the successor of SD-9! Unfortunatelly not in picture quality..
Is that true? I would buy the SD-10 because the very important improvements (ISO, noise, dynamic range...), but the pictures are fuzzy comparing to SD-9.
