photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty Four: The Workplace -- essence of a culture > Triple Take, Ghent, Belgium, 2005
previous | next
14-JUN-2005

Triple Take, Ghent, Belgium, 2005

I found this surprisingly incongruous juxtaposition of mannequins and window dressers in a Ghent storefront. Essentially, it’s simply a scene of two people in the workplace doing their everyday job – the row of slender headless mannequins, with their tiny behinds turned to face the street, are not amusing to them. Yet the multiple incongruities in this shot were very entertaining to our group of camera-toting tourists. One of the window dressers is almost completely abstracted. All we see are the dresser’s feet, and parts of each hand caressing a mannequin. The pot of colorful flowers breathing life into the very stiff mannequins adds a surreal touch to the scene. But the ultimate incongruity is the surprise of the window dresser on the ladder. She seemed bewildered to find herself the subject of a photograph. Perhaps if she could have seen what we were seeing, she might have smiled.

Canon PowerShot G6
1/100s f/4.0 at 7.2mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis20-May-2007 19:30
You make a very good point, Tricia. I had not even thought of the fact that she has purposely turned the mannequins around as a gesture of politeness. In doing so, however, she has created an even more amusing incongruity. The human butt is the most amusing part of the body -- and what she has done is to create a multiple "moon." Her working routine is so ingrained that she no longer sees naked mannequins as amusing or even strange. But when we see her reaction to the camera juxtaposed with three butts in a row, the incongruity is intensified and and subject/context juxtaposition is created.
flowsnow20-May-2007 18:35
The lady was obviously surprised to see someone taking a picture of her. It's funny to see how she has turned the mannequins the other way around. Maybe it was impolite to show the front to the crowd undressed. LOL It's a funny shot but what caught my attention was the `butt', all three of them facing the viewers. I would have actually taken a second look if I was there walking by and like you take a shot of it! Just for keeps of seeing `three butts' in the line.
Phil Douglis23-Aug-2005 18:08
There is a lot going here, Ana -- it is surreal. I love the expression on the face of the woman, too. It makes me see her as a mannequin come to life -- she seems surprised to find herself wearing clothes, having a head, and being stuck on a ladder. And yes, the fact that we are being simultaneously "mooned" by three figures who have butts but no heads, is quite bizarre to say the least. Yes, this is a moment we are not supposed to see. But we do, and the camera makes the moment last forever.
Ana Carloto O'Shea23-Aug-2005 15:40
Well, I've always wanted to comment on this one, because it was here "alone" without much interaction, but I see that Ágnes beat me to it ;)
I really like the almost shocked expression of the woman, because it does not relate to the work she is doing at all, if I only saw her face I would thing that she was caught doing something unlawful to say the least... The scene of the mannequins is indeed quite funny and worth of capture, even because they are facing us "butt shamelessly", which isn't always what happens, because many of these shops have curtins that prevent us from seeing what's happening in there. I guess that the view of naked mannequins isn't always seen like a normal sight as well as the persons working in there trying to make them look their best...
In a way it feels like you've caught this very private and x-rated moment in the life of a clothes shop ;) and a funny one too.
Phil Douglis18-Aug-2005 21:38
What delightful interpretation, Agnes. Stripping as fashion! Thank you for bringing an entirely different context to bear (bare?) on this image. Spending on money on clothes that are, as you say, invisible, has become a goal of high fashion. Given your interpretation, this becomes a wildly incongruous image, taking the idea to an extreme. Love it. You have wonderfully droll sense of humor, too.
Guest 18-Aug-2005 18:02
Okey..this shot i would call:sripping is becaming fashion..:)........The shot itself could be a poster of Escada,or Dolce&Gabbana..or..all of those famous shops..I would put a text like: U look like u are undressed,if u dont wear Escada...Escada will dress u!:)..And Escada will dress u to clothers,with cost million dollars,and still look like u dont even wear anything...its strange but nowdays it happen...u pay a fortune for a little piece of material... so this is why i can say..stripping becaming fashion!..lol..this is really the feeling what i get..it has a kind of trick,maybe cuz the dolls turned back,not front..so they look like,they are showing their ass to everyone on purpose....And the window dresser also dress the doll to noghing....
The other woman was surprised just cuz of the fact that she gonna be photographed by u,as u said....and she was not prepared to it...
Interesting shot..talks a lot about our actual lifestile..........We should think more ofthen about that,how much money we spend on clohes,with we never wear..or with dont even waste that money....

A.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment