photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty Four: The Workplace -- essence of a culture > Sweeper, Boataung Pagoda, Yangon, Myanmar, 2005
previous | next

Sweeper, Boataung Pagoda, Yangon, Myanmar, 2005

As they have for centuries, the people of Yangon clean their streets and temples by hand. Here, Botataung Temple undergoes a morning scrub down. This is an abstract approach to a workplace shot. The temple is famous for its stupa, which holds a hair of Buddha. I reduce that stupa to a shimmering gold reflection in the water the sweeper is using to clean the temple’s plaza. I tie the elements of this picture together with geometric rhythms. The sweeper’s head merges with the golden base of the stupa, a series of horizontal moldings. These horizontal lines repeat the flow of the horizontal safety rope the sweeper has put up to keep people away from the plaza while he cleans it. (I made sure the rope maintains its identity as a safety rope by not cropping out the small ribbons that hang from it at left and right. I did crop out some distracting elements on both the left and right sides of the frame.) The rope intersects with a red line extending the length of the plaza. The diagonal curb at the bottom of the frame repeats its diagonal thrust.

The sarong-clad sweeper himself, abstracted by the rear vantage point I am using, wields a broom that slices across both the rope and the paving line, and almost reaches the curb. The angle of the broom creates a series of triangles that seem to embrace the sweeper as he works. Meanwhile, the tilt of his hat brim echoes the angle of the broom, and the bend of his arm echoes the curves in the base of the stupa moldings. The final touch is the focal point of picture – as he steps carefully across the wet plaza, his right toe stops in mid step, pointing directly at the reflection of the temple’s most important shrine, its golden stupa.


other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis15-Aug-2005 01:07
Thanks, Anna. You see this image as all about serenity, and thus the rope becomes a distraction. I saw this image as an expression of working. That is why it is in this gallery. And that is why the rope is not a distraction, but at the essence of this image. It defines his task. It makes all that territory his and his alone. And it also works as part of the geometry of the picture. If the rope was not there, I would not have taken this shot. And there was no way I could crop it out or avoid it either -- it is central to my idea. I even made sure to include those little ribbons on it, which help give it its identity. We just have different ideas on what this image should be all about, Anna. And since this is my site, it's my idea that gets to go on this page. If my use of this example can help you learn more about expressive photography, it will be worth its weight in gold to me.
Anna Yu14-Aug-2005 06:14
A beautiful shot of a solitary worker, with a serene sense of the temple all around him. I think that rope is very distracting and disturbs the sense of serenity. Would have preferred it cropped out altogether.
Phil Douglis18-Mar-2005 23:39
Thanks, Bruce. Since your question involves your image, and not this one, I am responding to your question under the image in question here.
Guest 18-Mar-2005 23:11
Can we usehttp://www.pbase.com/stormseye/image/34386915 as an example? The picture is of two fishermen, wading into the sea beneath a large summer moon. My original composition included quite a bit of water in the foreground. The end result was that the subjects seemed rather far away. There was nothing particularly important going on in the foreground (other than the colors reflected in the water), so I took a suggestion to crop the photo, and the result was that it brought the subjects forward and made them much larger. You can see that I have been offered an opposite opinion. This is just one example, but often the debate is internal. How much context to include? One person's distracting and extraneous detail might be another person's essential clue to environment and story.
Phil Douglis18-Mar-2005 22:17
Good question, Bruce. I have no set style of shooting when it comes to composing an image. Now and then I do zero in on my subject -- look at my Detail Gallery, for example. But when shooting subjects that are surrounded by space, I ask myself how that space can contribute to meaning. If, as here, it does, I layer it into my image. If the space is distracting or adds irrelevant information, I remove it. There should be no conflicting advice on this subject -- it is all a matter of what you are trying to express, and the nature of the subject and the space around it. Hope this helps clear up any doubts.
Guest 18-Mar-2005 20:58
As you did in "Water Carrier" and "Dust Patrol", you included a generous portion of foreground. Here this allowed you to include the strong diagonal, and in all three the foreground allows for a feeling of spaciousness. Do you have any particular thoughts on when this is appropriate to do, or is it more of a "feel" kind of decision? I've gotten conflicting advice on zeroing in on your subject, and allowing for a sense of depth and space.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment