photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Sixteen: Story-telling street photography > Guy watching, Dublin, Ireland, 2004
previous | next
26-AUG-2004

Guy watching, Dublin, Ireland, 2004

Waiting and watching pays off in street photography. As I was walking through a very busy Dublin intersection during the lunch hour, I noticed many people standing back against their office buildings chatting with each other and watching the crowds flow past.
I was able to work unnoticed for two reasons. First, these women were intent on people watching, and although I was close enough to hear them chat, I was not close enough for them to notice me. And secondly, because I use a fixed lens digicam for most of my pictures, instead of a digital single lens reflex, I don’t have to hold my camera up in front of my face to look through the viewfinder. Instead, I can flip my LCD viewing screen up, and lower the camera to down my waist to shoot. I set the LCD at right angles to the camera so that I could face away from these women, even though my camera’s lens was aimed directly at them. I photographed them in this manner for more than five minutes, and they never noticed me. Being virtually invisible is a major advantage in street photography.

I concentrated on the interplay between the two women, using the other people in the frame as context. When the woman in white made a humorous comment about a man in the distance, and the lady in blue assumed a look of cool appraisal while taking a draw on her cigarette, I was able to capture the interplay of expression I was looking for. I was also fortunate to get at least four men into the picture – and no other women were visible. Surrounded by men as they laughed and smoked, what else could these women be talking about but guys?

Canon PowerShot G5
1/60s f/4.0 at 14.4mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis21-Oct-2004 22:07
Thanks, Jen, for your excellent analysis of this image. You expressed very much what I intended to do here. It is all about intimacy and secret thoughts. I worked on this sitation for five minutes and this one said it best. I divided the image in half with that tree as well a post because these verticals divide the picture in half. One of them is the intimate world of the women, the other the world of the passing men. I know it is considered to be "bad form" to cut an image in half like that, but sometimes the image works because of it. And this was one of those times to ignore a so-called rule.

I agree about the distracting accidental mergers in the background over one of these women's shoulder. I might have been able to block out that mess, but I did not ever see them -- I was concentrating too hard on her expression. As for cloning them out in photoshop, I would never do that, since this is street photography, and I do not remove people from my pictures electronicaly. We will just have to forever live with that head on her shoulder, right?
Jennifer Zhou16-Oct-2004 12:41
It is interesting while these two women talking about other guys without being noticed, they at the same time became the "target" of your camera..
This is a very intimate scene telling story about people's behaviors in the public place. By being an observer you have captured the very original, real sense of it. The women's expressions are the key to this picture and you got them perfectly.

I also like the blur man on the side, he became a good context for the picture but still put viewers' focus on these two women.

The strong point for this picture is human value, and it also has incongruity between different gender, still and moving, to be aware and not to be aware.. You did working on the abstraction as well to frame only guys in the background, but that head on the white shirt woman's shoulder is kind of distracted.

I notice there was a tree divided this picture and seems too divided the two women and the blur man apart which help to tell the story as well.

Jen
Phil Douglis12-Oct-2004 03:52
Thanks, Carol, for commenting on this image. I value your comment greatly for several reasons -- you are a street photographer yourself, you have shot with both digicams and now a DSLR, and you are a woman. You know how difficult it is to shoot the roving eyes of people as they size up members of the opposite gender, and you have characterized the expressions here quite accurately. In your own street photography, you will definitely find it a lot tougher to "work the street" invisibly now that you've moved to a DSLR, but the key is to keep at it, and eventually you will get your share of street photos that say what you want them to say. On the other hand, I am sure that you also find that your DRebel delivers a much richer, more detailed image than your old digicam did, right?
Carol E Sandgren12-Oct-2004 03:10
I too find my street photography more challenging because of my new Canon DRebel. I do find myself more visible but it still doesn't stop me from trying. (Sadly my old digicam is not working properly anymore so that's not an option.) In this shot the girls seem to be staring past the guy on the left, as if they do not want to be discovered staring and sizing him up. Something we women do a lot! They both have already done a lot of looking at him and now just need to take that drag and go on to their next "victim"!
Phil Douglis09-Oct-2004 22:58
A very good point, Rodney. DSLRS are marvelous tools -- the offer interchangeable lenses, large sensors for smooth, noiseless images -- essential for making very large prints, as well as no shutter lag, and fast burst shooting. But they also have serious drawbacks -- they require you to put a camera in front of your face, making you appear to be masked and intrusive. When you shoot with a flipout LCD, you are far less threatening, see more peripheral info, and can interact with people much more easily. You can also make yourself virtually invisible by shooting with your LCD set at right angles to the subject. When you are seen fiddling around with something at your waist while looking away from your subject, you are often disregarded.

Unfortunately, DSLRS can't yet use flip out LCD technology because of the mirror you must use to see through the lens. Because they don't make you view through a mirror, digicams can also give you live preview -- showing you exactly what your electronic picture will look like, while a DSLR does not. And, for me anyway, digicams re much easier to carry around all day while shooting on my travels. My days of schlepping a heavy bag full of lenses are over and done with forever!
Guest 09-Oct-2004 21:30
You make an interesting point about using a digital point/shoot with the flip LCD. In addition to being less obtrusive, you can also get more unique angles (e.g., hip level photos, etc). My first digital was a coolpix 4500. I miss it sometimes (traded in, along with my Nikon N80 film body for Canon 10D earlier this year). I find with my 10D i'm more 'visible' to people. Given so few people are around to begin with, I really stand out. I think the more people around, the more one can get away with being invisible, as you are in the middle of a crowd
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment