photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Nine: Composition -- putting it together > Cemetery, Poncochile, Chile, 2003
previous | next
25-DEC-2003

Cemetery, Poncochile, Chile, 2003

"You die here, you dry here," they say in Chile’s Atacama Desert. There was not a blade of grass in Poncochile's Cemetery. It does not rain here. This the driest desert on earth. I saw this cemetery as a series of layers in space, and created the perception of depth by relating one layer to another. A wideangle perspective is essential. Using a 24mm wideangle converter lens on my camera, I anchored the shot around the boulders in the foreground. These boulders echo the shapes of the hills that rise in the background. Instead of centering the boulders in the frame, I move them off to the right, leaving a path on the right for the eye to flow into the image. The middle layer is the cemetery itself, frail wooden crosses adrift in a field of sand. The third layer is a progression of the rolling barren hills of the Atacama itself, where nothing lives – an eerie echo of the nature of the cemetery itself. All three layers interact, supporting each other to express the nature of this place. Poncochile is a small town in a very hard place, and this is where it buries its dead.

Canon PowerShot G5
1/1250s f/4.0 at 7.2mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis10-Oct-2005 04:59
Glad this image makes you think of how you would have composed it, Lisbeth. When I looked at this scene, one of the most godforsaken cemeteries on earth, I saw the linkage between the boulders and the hills immediately, and moved to place the cemetery between them. And yes, I moved the boulders to the right, allowing the eye to flow into the cemetery from the left. The idea of a time line flowing through this image fascinates me, Lisbeth. The boulders are ancient, as are the barren hills, while the graves are relatively new. Everything in this image, however, is dead. There is little sign of life in this, one of the harshest climates on earth.
Lisbeth Landstrøm09-Oct-2005 21:16
I am fascinated by your modelling of this picture. You have strengthened very much the expression of this picture by your distance and the placing of the boulders - creating the impression of "flow". It is not only the flow of the eye through the picture but also a flow giving meaning to the picture (by its indications of for instance a time-line and a place where people are at "the front" having only few ressources to dwell on the past). I have tried to learn from this picture by asking myself what I would have done here. I think I would instinctively have gone too close to the cemetery - probably resulting in fragmentation.
Phil Douglis10-Apr-2005 03:45
Thanks, Catriona, for this fine analysis. As you can see from my caption, I very carefully left that path leading into the picture from the lower left hand corner to enable the viewer to enter the image and walk into the graveyard. This is a matter of my vantage point, which is the key to composition here. I carefully moved the camera so that the top of my frame almost touches the tops of the mountains but stops just enough short of them to create tension, drawing the eye into the earth instead of the sky. It took a number of tries to find the right spot for the boulders, the path and the tops of the mountains to work together. Composition is a matter of being aware of how everything is organized so that the image can best expresses what we feel or what we are trying to say. Thank you for understanding my thoughts here, Catriona, and for appreciating the result.
Guest 10-Apr-2005 00:51
What a magnificent place to spend Christmas Day in 2003 Phil! By positioning the boulders to the right of the frame you are enabling the viewer to enter the picture and 'walk through' the grave site. Had you positioned the boulders in the centre, they would have placed a barrier between the viewer and the graves, meaning that the viewer would be distant - on the outside looking in. You are letting the viewer into the image.

The colours are wonderful, all tones of brown earth. The crosses stand out against the land because of their vertical and horizontal lines nicely contained within that middle layer. I like the way that you have kept the sky to a minimum, placing emphasis on the characteristics of the land. This image shows a harsh, dry place where nothing lives. Thanks for showing this in your image Phil!
Bailey Zimmerman25-Apr-2004 20:15
A river of graves in desolation.....this defines "stark"....very moving!!!
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment