CHEAP_vs_EXPENSIVE.jpg by Miljenko Devcic

Miljenko Devcic | all galleries >> tech >> Lens reviews and tests > CHEAP_vs_EXPENSIVE.jpg


23-JUL-2004

Nikon D70
1/4000s f/2.8 at 200.0mm iso400 hide exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto

All photos are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed without the expressed, written consent of the author.

comment |

Miljenko Devcic		19-Apr-2006 07:54
Hi Benjammer, using telelens at high apertures is not a realistic option. Even f/5.0 is sometimes to slow for low light/fast moving object situations. This doesn't mean that Sigma 70-300 APO2 is a bad lens. On contrary, it outperforms similary priced OEM telezooms.

Guest		17-Apr-2006 00:51
Besides the colours I Think the cheap lens might be winning at f22, but of course expencive seems better for everything else, which will definetly be more commonly used.

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment