Larry Miller |
profile
|
all galleries
>>
Galleries
>> lens_comparisons
tree view
| thumbnails |
slideshow
Bookshelf - 28-300 - 135mm.jpg
Bookshelf - 24-120 -120mm.jpg
70mm - 28-300duck100.jpg
70mm - 28-300duck.jpg
70mm - 24-120duck100.jpg
70mm - 24-120duck.jpg
70mm - 24-70duck100.jpg
70mm - 24-70duck.jpg
28mm - 28-300.jpg
24mm-24-120.jpg
120mm -28-300.jpg
120mm -24-120.jpg
70mmtest -70-200.jpg
70mmtest - 70-300.jpg
70mmtest - 28-300.jpg
70mmtest - 24-120.jpg
70mmtest - 24-70.jpg
Sigma150-500at290mm.jpg
Nikkor28-300mmat300m.jpg
Nikkor16-35mmat28mm.jpg
Nikkor28-300mmat28mm.jpg
Sigma50mm1.4-A.jpg
Nikkor28-300mmat52mm-A.jpg
f-28-300 210mmflowers.jpg
e-70-200 200mmflowers.jpg
a-70-200: 200mm.jpg
b-28-300: 210mm.jpg
c-70-200: 105mm.jpg
d-28-300: 105mm.jpg
comment
|
share
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to
login
or
register
first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address.
Name
Name
Email
help
private comment
Guest
21-Jan-2011 16:39
I had 28-300 for a week and return to get 24-120 and complement the range with 70-300VR but.. for most of my work i use primes.
Larry Miller
01-Oct-2010 15:43
The purpose of this gallery is simply to compare Nikon's new 28-300mm VRII to the almost new and more expensive 70-200mm VRII. Not intended to be beautiful.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to
login
or
register
first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address.
Name
Name
Email
help
private comment
click on thumbnails for full image