photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
jCross | all galleries >> What I Did Today >> What I Did Today 2017 > September 4, 2017
previous | next
04-SEP-2017

September 4, 2017

170904_0001N.jpg



Well, looks like another hurricane is headed this way. Everybody knows to check the National Hurricane Center for forecast discussions and graphics. These guys do a good job. When you read their discussions they talk about a bunch of different models which give differing storm tracks. These model results are put together in what is called a spaghetti model. It is not called that because it is a pasta dish or a Clint Eastwood movie. It looks like spaghetti because the lines do not fall on top of each other. Each colored line is the result of one model. This particular one has the models in reasonable agreement. In the case of Hurricane Harvey, the models were all over the place. Remember a model is just a model. All you climate chicken littles out there need to remember that. Models diverge and models are not predictions. If you trust one single model you are a fool. The famous hockey stick model of global warming was just that, a single prediction that you would never take as gospel unless you have a liberal arts degree or are prone to taking what others tell you as gospel. God gave you a brain, so use it.

Now, here is what is interesting. The green dots are the National Hurricane Center predictions. These guys only forecast out 5 days because they actually have science or engineering degrees and understand that long term predictions are, by definition, wrong. The leftmost dot is the 5 day predicted position of Irma. They are going right down the middle of the models with a little body English from their experience with hurricanes. In the next 24 hours their predictions might indicate a sharp northward turn if the models don't change (which they will). They have not mentioned anything in the discussions that might tip their hand about six or seven days out. These guys are pros. It will be interesting to see what happens. If you don't find this interesting you must remember that I am easily amused.

0.00s full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
comment | share
jCross07-Sep-2017 11:14
you might be right about that.
I'll have to check.
I'll get back to you.
Dave Beedon07-Sep-2017 06:26
I think One of the Ford agency's models is named Polly Styrene.
jCross06-Sep-2017 13:37
No, Dave, they are
by the Ford Agency
in New York.
Dave Beedon06-Sep-2017 08:05
Thanks for an explanation of this type of forecasting.
Are any of those models by Revell?
(Yes, I am a smart-ass.)
Chris Gibbins05-Sep-2017 20:28
Not that being non-PC stops me from speaking out, of course!
Chris Gibbins05-Sep-2017 20:26
It's refreshing to hear someone else also skeptical about model predictions and global warming! There may well be a degree of global warming going on, but as a scientist who once worked on the edges of this, I doubt very much that it's anthropogenic in origin. But to say this these days is considered very much non-PC!