Voigtländer Macro Apo-Lanthar 125mm f2.5 and Pentax SMC-A* 135mm f1.8 Lens Comparison Photo Gallery by Jim King at pbase.com

Voigtländer Macro Apo-Lanthar 125mm f2.5 and Pentax SMC-A* 135mm f1.8 Lens Comparison

The images in this comparison are 300x300 pixel 100% crops from photos taken with my *ist-D. The USAF chart was about 2m from the camera; this distance was adjusted to provide about equal magnification. The brick wall was about 40m away; no adjustment was made for magnification.

pages 1 2 ALL

IMGP4786 V125M@f2.5.jpg	IMGP4787 V125M@f2.8.jpg	IMGP4788 V125M@f4.jpg	IMGP4789 V125M@f5.6.jpg
IMGP4790 V125M@f8.jpg	IMGP4799 A*135@f1.8.jpg	IMGP4800 A*135@f2.jpg	IMGP4801 A*135@f2.4.jpg
IMGP4802 A*135@f2.8.jpg	IMGP4803 A*135@f4.jpg	IMGP4804 A*135@f5.6.jpg	IMGP4805 A*135@f8.jpg

pages 1 2 ALL

comment |

Guest		27-Oct-2009 09:08
Very interesting test Jim. Going by the test chart the Voigtländer appears to be the better lens, however it's the opposite with the brickwall test - here, the Voigtländer clearly trails behind the A135, even at f8. I'm actually a bit surprised by how poorly (relatively speaking) the Voigtländer fares here. A few things to note: 1) The lack of PF/CA with the Voigtländer. The A suffers here on the test chart wide-open, though it's not too bad at the common apertures with the Voigtländer. Also, this PF might be less when used with more recent bodies (K20D and newer). 2) The A*135 is impressively sharp at f1.8 and f2.0. Sure, it's not quite as sharp as compared to f2.4 and up, but it's not what I would call soft. The main issue here is the reduced contrast, however that can be fixed in PP (and maybe using a lens hood would help too). Anyways, thanks for doing this test of what are probably the two finest K-mount 135mm lenses ever produced!

click on thumbnails for full image

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment