photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty Eight: Using symbols and metaphors to express meaning > A doorstop revisited, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 2007
previous | next
12-NOV-2007

A doorstop revisited, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 2007

I first photographed this doorstop in front of a Santa Fe art gallery in 2006.
(Click on thumbnail below). I used it then as an example of layering. On my most recent visit, I photographed it again but in a different way. Instead of inviting my viewers to go inside the gallery, I build the image around the symbolism of an Indian turned into a chair, and put into the context of a poster promoting wine tasting, featuring other Indians. A heavily romanticized version of Indian culture is heavily marketed by the Santa Fe art community and this doorstop is intended to stop visitors in their tracks, and perhaps go inside to buy something. I see it as symbolizing the Indian as a sentimental, passive and mildly amusing representative of the stereotypical Old West. It transforms a personification of what once was a proudly independent culture into a clever contemporary convenience – a chair. I also see it as a metaphor for the proverbial “wooden Indian,” – a throwback to the “cigar store Indians” that once advertised cigar shops. Only here, the product becomes art and wine. This time I was able to photograph the scene in late afternoon light, adding a shadow to the scene. The shadow, slowly enveloping the wine-tasting poster, adds still another layer of symbolism to this image. The shadow replicates the shape of the Indian, but in shadow, the Indian appears as faceless as his culture -- a culture often treated as a historical artifact. Ironically, when I compare this image with my 2005 photograph, I notice that the painted Indian seems to be gradually fading away, just as the gradual erosion of American Indian tradition.




Leica V-Lux 1
1/320s f/5.6 at 54.1mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis27-Nov-2007 19:14
Thanks for adding to your comment, Patricia. I never saw anything in your comment about taking advantage of Indians. You saw, instead, a growth of awareness on my part. The two images say different things -- we both see the 2007 version as more poignant in nature. And I agree with you that much also depends upon what each viewer might bring to these in the way of context. I am sure the gallery owners would see both of these images in a different way from either of us, and so on. That is the wonderful thing about photographic expression. There are no rules or expected results. Everything ultimately depends on the context in which an image is perceived and what happens when it enters the imagination of the viewer.
Patricia Lay-Dorsey27-Nov-2007 05:05
Phil, I need to clarify my comment. In no way was I implying that you take advantage of Native Americans in the 2005 image or in any of your photographs. I was merely comparing the 2007 and the 2005 images of the same object. They each came at it from such different perspectives, and in doing so, elicited different feelings in the viewer. I'm sure the social worker in me prefers the poignant depiction in 2007 to the more upbeat one of 2005 because it resonates with my own perceptions of how the Anglo culture of which I am a part has treated these folks over the years. As I see it, this kind of discussion is a sign of your success in using symbols to express meaning.
Phil Douglis27-Nov-2007 00:07
Thanks, Patricia, for being the first to comment on this image. I saw the sadness too. It seems more poignant to me now than it did two years ago when I first photographed it. I don't see myself as playing along with the Santa Fe tendency to use the Indian as a marketing device. I will leave it up to each viewer to decide from my image to what extent the Indian is being either celebrated or taken advantage of. Historically, Indian culture and art have been
heavily promoted in Santa Fe by both Anglo and Indian alike. The Santa Fe Railroad and the Fred Harvey Company opened the American Southwest to tourism in the early 20th Century. And to this day, Indians sell their goods in galleries here, and in their stalls at the Palace of the Governors. (http://www.pbase.com/image/20746677 )
Patricia Lay-Dorsey26-Nov-2007 23:44
I see such sadness in his face that this symbolizes the entire Native American experience of life since my European ancestors conquered their country. And the poster with the three supplicating women demeans their contributions to this enduring culture. It all makes me so sad. To my eyes, your 2007 photo shows your own internal growth of awareness, Phil. In 2005 you seemed more content to play along with the Sante Fe tendency to use the Native Americans to sell their wares. Our photographs are always documents of who we are as much as what we see.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment