photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Thirty Two: On Safari -- expressing the essence of nature > Leopard, South Luangwa National Park, Zambia,
previous | next
07-JAN-2006

Leopard, South Luangwa National Park, Zambia,

During the second week of this, my fifth wildlife safari, I photographed my first leopard. It was high in a tree, not far from our Puku Ridge camp. Leopards are frequently seen in South Luangwa National Park, generally at night, but there are no guarantees of a sighting. During the first week, we briefly saw a leopard running through bush in the glare of a spotlight during a night game drive. But this one was sitting high in a tree in late afternoon. It was a difficult shot at best -- the leopard was in deep shadow, and sun was coming directly into the lens through the leaves. I exposed for the leopard, and extended my zoom lens to nearly 700mm to bring it close enough to look us in the eye. Extremely shy, this leopard would take flight even as I pressed the shutter button. This image is compelling because of its context and its intimacy. It is more than a closeup of an animal. It tells us where it lives, and reflects its wary, tense response to my presence. The green eyes are enormous, aware, and dramatically outlined in black. We don’t see all of it – just enough to integrate its body with the branches of the tree. It seems to be protecting itself, framed in bark and vines and leaves. A study in reclusiveness, its the story of the leopard itself.


After posting this image, viewer Alister Benn suggested cropping it to place greater emphasis on the leopard itself, and less on its original leafy context. It is the cropped version you see here. You can compare it to my original full frame version which is posted at http://www.worldisround.com/articles/271122/photo7.html

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30
1/80s f/4.0 at 88.8mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis15-May-2006 16:32
Thanks, John, for your observations and link to your own leopard image. As for the ethics involved in retouching your picture to remove a stick cutting across the leopards face, it comes down to how you have or have not changed the meaning of the picture. If you had created a frame of green leaves around the head of the leopard and cloned them in to your picture, you would have created an image that never existed in fact. It would have become an imaginary photograph. Which is fine if you are expressing a fictional leopard. But if you wanted to express the reality of the scene, that would not work. The stick, on the other hand, was not pivotal to meaning. It was incidental. I kept my branch in because it was simply part of nature and in my view, did not detract from the leopard, even though some comments here say otherwise. But if it was chopping the face of the leopard in two, I would have wanted to remove it, just as you did.
John Fletcher15-May-2006 14:04
I agree with leaving the stick in. I opted to remove one in this photo:
http://www.pbase.com/h4xintl/image/29790236
only because it cut directly across the leopard's face. Every time I look at it I wonder if that much manipulation is ethical, yet it made for a much more interesting photo.
Now, having started near the end of your tutorials, Phil, I will start at the beginning and savor them all. Thanks for posting them.
Phil Douglis09-Mar-2006 20:53
The vegetation is important context, Shirley. The leopard usually hides behind it. Those leaves are like the walls of its house. I was glad to include at least a few of them in this image.
Shirley Wang09-Mar-2006 18:36
I like the green leaves on the top that offer some contrast and layers.
Phil Douglis17-Feb-2006 23:14
Jen, I have had some pbase artists offer to show me how to take that branch out with Photoshop, but after giving the issue more thought, I would rather just leave it there. The more I live with this picture, the more the branch seems to fit. It is, after all, part of the leopard's life and home.
Jennifer Zhou07-Feb-2006 09:28
Phil, I think this image is powerful enough for me to ignore the branch, though like Celia, I would love if the branch is not there. However, I think I am learning to accept it as part of the nature, and part of the message here. Thank you Phil!
Phil Douglis05-Feb-2006 04:31
Thanks, Celia, for your impressions on this image, which is one of my favorites. If I had been able to remove the branch from this scene in the frame, I would have done so. But I could not. If I was able to retouch it out with Photoshop, I would have, but do not have that degree of retouching skill. So I have accepted its presence as a mark of nature, and since this image is all about nature, I am not overly concerned about it as an aesthetic distraction.
The power of this crop rests in its intimacy. It is a hypnotic image, and one that will always symbolize the beauty and majesty of the natural world.
Cecilia Lim05-Feb-2006 00:35
I do like your original crop too Phil and I feel that the thin stringy branch and green leaves in this image work better in the context of your orginal crop. This later crop however allows us to be more intimate with the leopard and is more engaging because of the element of abstraction. You leave much to the imagination when you don't show us the whole (or much of) the tree. Our eyes are normally drawn to images that are not depicted the way our eyes normally see, such as this crop. Also,by moving close, you allow us to see the beautiful textures, details and expression.

For me, I would have loved to see this image in this crop without the stringy branch and leaves, filtering the image down to the very essence of the art of camouflage that plays a huge part in this animal's life. Here the leopard's spots blend in completely with the pattern on the tree bark. He and the tree are one. It becomes a powerful summary of this animal's nature and way of life.
Phil Douglis31-Jan-2006 23:47
You are the first to pick up on the color relationship between the leopard's eyes and the color of the bark. As for the branch, you did not notice it because you accepted it is as part of that tree and thus part of nature. Aesthetically, it may seem superfluous and even distracting, as it is to Jen, but in wildlife photography, some things come along with the territory and we must simply accept their presence as natural. You are also right, Mia, about the importance of the detail. I size all my images in the original at 1000 pixels on the longest side, which makes the detail leap out at us. It certainly speaks to us here. Thanks, as always, for posting these observations.
Mia 31-Jan-2006 22:59
I had not noticed the branch until Jen mentioned it. This leopard's eyes are mesmerizing. Also, their colour matches green patches of the bark. Advice to all the people who look at this picture: look at the biggest version possible. It gets better and better.
Phil Douglis27-Jan-2006 18:29
Thanks, Jen. A shot such as this can be a once in a lifetime image. I have been on five wildlife safaris and this is the only time I have ever photographed a leopard. All you say is true, and yes, the long branch that extends through the image can be a distraction for some. But in wildlife photography, we must accept the presence of nature. That branch belongs there. There is no way to take it out when making the image -- you are in a fixed vantage point, and the branch is there, and so you accept it as part of nature. If a viewer is distracted by it, so be it. I do not have the Photoshop skills to laboriously take it out -- and there are some that would call such electronic manipulation unethical in wildlife photography. When considering the importance of so-called distractions such as this, we must also consider the purpose of the picture itself. This is not a work of photographic art. It is not fiction. It is nature. The branch is part of nature. So is the leopard. Accept them both for what they are, enjoy the image, and learn from it.
Jennifer Zhou27-Jan-2006 14:33
I like the cropping, it really emphasises the Leopard's expression, which is the most important thing in the picture right? Also you keep the context---the tree! I notice the Leopard is kind of blending in the texture of the tree, to make himself less noticeable in order to catch his prey..He is very smart!

One more thing, the branch in front of Leoard's face is kind of distracting, my eyes keep going back.. Do you find it distracting too?
Phil Douglis25-Jan-2006 05:41
Yes, I see its human qualities. It's only natural that we try to cast animals in our own image. But as I was discussing with Christine under my baby giraffe shot athttp://www.pbase.com/pnd1/image/55264928 , I feel its important to think of animals as animals if we are to come to understand them.
alibenn25-Jan-2006 01:50
Very thoughtful, like human....
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2006 19:13
Mo -- read your manual again! The Panasonic FZ-30 offers "EZ" -- "extended optical zoom." Go to the record menu and look under picture size. It is set at eight megapixels, right. That gives you normal 12x maximum zoom magnification. In other words, you can zoom up to 420mm. But if you REDUCE your picture size to only 5 megapixels, the icon "EZ" will come up on your LCD screen. That means you can zoom out to 535mm if you want, with no loss of image quality. It will just have fewer pixels, which mean it can't be cropped as much or printed as large as an 8 megapixel image can. In effect, you are cropping your image in the camera, but without the deterioration you get by using the so-called "digital zoom" option.

If you are using your picture only on the web, where you normally post an image no larger than 1,000 pixels on its longest side anyway, you can reduce the image size even more -- if you choose three megapixels, the FZ-30 can zoom out to 668mm. That's what I used here. Hope this helps.
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2006 19:02
You are right, Dandan -- the eyes are hypnotic. They are, along with the spots and the long tail, the hallmark of the leopard.
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2006 19:00
I have to hand it to you, Alister -- I was so hung up on context -- the tree, the tree, the tree -- that I never even considered cropping out most of the tree to stress the expression. Usually, when you crop a picture as closely as this you wind up with just an animal portrait and lose the context that makes it expressive. But your suggested crop retains the body of the tree and it retains enough context to make this portrait into expression. Thank you and thank you still again for this suggestion! That is the glory of teaching -- you give and you get. You certainly gave much to me here, Alister.
monique jansen24-Jan-2006 14:18
I did not even know the Panasonic could zoom up to 700 mm, or did you purchase the extra zoom lens for this trip?
It is a wonderful "portrait" of a beautiful animal, living in freedom in the wild.
Guest 24-Jan-2006 12:25
The eyes are so intense. It makes me want to know what his /her target is…
alibenn24-Jan-2006 11:20
I much prefer this....the look on the animals face is full of character, which was lost in the original version...The added tension of having the eyes on the left half of the frame adds a snese of wild existance to this image as well....great
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2006 06:55
I tried your suggestion, Alister, and like it. Here it is. What do you think of it now. I like it. I liked the original version as well because did a good job of putting the leopard into its context. This is more leopard, less context. But you are right -- by removing all of the bright areas, we focus attention on the leopard itself.
alibenn24-Jan-2006 06:27
It wouldn't be an Alister Benn comment on this gallery without a crop suggestion!!!!

I see this a s a vertical, cropping a good chunk in from the right to eliminate the bright green bottom right corner, and a crop from the left to eliminate the bright left side. The diagonal of the tree fork coming from the bottom left of the frame and exiting top right...The Leopard ( a young one by the look of it) would then be looking out into a thin left side frame...adding tension, a question as to why he looks so alert and questioning him and the viewer...I feel the top left bright area is competing quite strongly with the subject for the eyes attention..

It works as is, but unlike some of my other crop suggestions, I feel a new crop would not just be aesthetically more pleasing, but add depth...
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2006 02:52
I wish I was as confident as you are, Tim, as to how I found this image. Yes, I was "present" (as our mutual friend Reid Callanan of the Santa Fe Workshops is so fond of reminding us) and yes I was "watchful," but I did not find this leopard by myself. Our guide simply said "there's a leopard in that tree" and I looked up and saw nothing but leaves and branches and I asked "Where is it?" and he answered "Right there -- look for a long tail" and that's what I found. A tail. And from there I was able to locate this leopard looking right into my lens. So yes, it was lesson in looking, but it was a gradual process. One thing leading to another to another.
Tim May23-Jan-2006 20:33
I see this as a lesson in looking - As photographers are eyes are never resting - just like the Leopard's must be - we want to catch the light, the moment, the feeling - here you saw this! you found it - because you were present and watchful.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment