photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty: Controlling perspective with the wideangle lens > Reclining Buddha, Yangon, Myanmar, 2005
previous | next
01-FEB-2005

Reclining Buddha, Yangon, Myanmar, 2005

This is a similar subject to the preceding example, yet it takes advantage of an entirely different use of the wideangle lens. The great reclining Buddha of Bagon was located in very tight building. The wideangle lens allowed me to some how make a photo of it. Yet this even larger reclining Buddha is housed in a massive structure with plenty of space to maneuver. Here the problem was not to somehow fit the Buddha into the frame. Instead, the goal is to stress the huge scale of the Buddha figure itself. The 24mm lens does this very well. I found a solitary monk praying to this enormous figure and used a vantage point that allowed me to create scale incongruity by contrasting scale relationships. I anchor the photo along its left hand edge, stressing the huge arm holding up the head, and I compare that big arm to the tiny monk in the lower right hand corner, who also uses his arms, but for a quite different purpose. The three layers in this image are stacked from left to right rather than from bottom to top. The foreground anchor is at left, the middle ground embraces the head and body of the Buddha figure, and the background features the point of the picture -- the tiny monk praying to the huge sculpture. Another incongruity stressed by the wideangle lens is the nature of the building itself. It could just as well be an industrial warehouse. Yet the Burmese use it as a house of worship. The wideangle effectively frames the Buddha in a mass of girders, panels, and towers, adding one incongruity to another.

Canon PowerShot G6
1/50s f/2.5 at 7.2mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis09-Jul-2005 17:49
Thank you, Pam, for this comment. I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this image, because it is an excellent example of how to create scale incongruity by using the wideangle lens. And you are right -- there is a double incongruity or contrast here. The size difference between the Buddha and the monk is staggering. And the industrial shed is an unlikely environment for a religious encounter. Glad you enjoyed it and keep the comments coming.
Guest 09-Jul-2005 14:55
What a great picture! The contrast between the statue and its unlikely environment add a lot to it.
Phil Douglis28-Feb-2005 05:09
Glad you were as struck by the expressive quality of the scale incongruity here as I was, Dandan. The industrial warehouse type building is another wonderful layer of incongruity here as well. We see a huge Buddha figure stretched out in what looks like Costco (a warehouse shopping chain here in the US). Why? Probably the funds for the building only provided for basic shelter, not religious architecture. And that's what they got for their money!
Guest 27-Feb-2005 19:16
This is a striking image. Addition to the obvious scale incongruity, the contract between the tiny black monk on his knees, which symbolizes the real life believers, and this huge and shining golden laying down Buddha makes this image a very expressive one. It represents the idea behind the Buddhism. But why the building looks like industrial warehouse?
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment