photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty: Controlling perspective with the wideangle lens > New Paint, Old Building, Yangon, Myanmar, 2005
previous | next

New Paint, Old Building, Yangon, Myanmar, 2005

This image offers a good example of barrel distortion. Note how the doors on either end bend towards the middle of the picture, and how the sidewalk seems to curve. Actually, the doors stand perpendicular to the ground, and the sidewalk is really straight. To some, this distortion may be a flaw. There are expensive wideangle lenses that do not exhibit such barrel distortion, but not for cameras such as the one I use. I regard such mild barrel distortion as an asset, a form of emphasis. The appearance of this crumbling building in Yangon’s Indian Quarter is subtly altered. It appears to stretch, to be larger than it actually is. Since there is only one layer in this image, the illusion of the curved street serves to imply depth. The only time that barrel distortion is distracting is when a human face or body is bent or stretched out of proportion. Such a problem does not exist here. The three men, wearing longyi sarongs, the Burmese national costume for both genders, are not distorted because of their central position in the frame. Only the information towards the edges of a wideangle image is subject to such bending. These men await customers in front of their paint store, while their own antiquated building, which has seen empires rise and fall in old Rangoon, incongruously very much needs the product they sell.


other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis07-May-2005 22:45
Yes they would, Ruthie. The woods are full of creatures who will wail mindlessly at any image that is not perfectly squared off. They are also convinced that you need to spend hundreds of dollars more than necessary to buy a wideangle lens that avoids the evils of barrel distortion, forgetting in the process that there is really no such thing as distortion. What they see as distortion is simply a deviation from a rigid standard of expectations that have nothing at all to do with expression. Thank you for seeing the vitality brought to this image by the so called flaws of barrel distortion.( It's amazing what you can do with a simple 24mm wideangle conversion lens, costing only $150, that slips over the zoom lens of an advanced compact digital camera.)
ruthemily07-May-2005 18:17
techgeeks would spend hours moaning over a lens that produces such "awful" results, and more hours altering the barrel distortion in photoshop. this photograph is a great one to use in any future skewering of such idiots! it is brilliant, and it is brilliant because of its "flaws". the perspective distortion pulls the centre of the frame, and the main subjects right out towards the viewer and adds so much emphasis on them and the shop. they leap out of the screen, like they are ready to leap out and grab any potential customers as they pass by! had this been corrected and the pavement straightened and the walls flattened, it would be really boring. the wideangle perspective, once again, adds energy and life.
Phil Douglis07-Mar-2005 01:38
The girls serve two purposes: first, the wideangle diminishes them in size because they are further away from the camera than the man. This adds to the illusion of depth, even in a single layer image such as this. The building looks larger as well, because it embraces five people instead of two and I wanted a large building. And I get a curving sidewalk due to the barrel distortion effect of the wideangle lens. If I cropped them out, that curving sidewalk, and indeed, the entire sweep of the building, would be abbreviated.

Secondly, the presence of those girls ask questions of the viewer - are they possible customers, who have stopped to make up their minds about something? Or are they shopping for something else? Will anyone of those young men eventually notice them standing thre? Anytime we can make our viewers stop and think, it will be to our advantage.

Thanks, Dandan, for asking this excellent question.

Phil
Guest 06-Mar-2005 16:56
Phil, one more question on cropping: what is the purpose of leaving the two girls in the frame?
Phil Douglis28-Feb-2005 06:42
Good eye, Junwu. In this case, as they say, the "shoemaker's children go barefoot!"
Jun Wu27-Feb-2005 22:29
Good point, Phil. The shop sign and the painting peeling off the facade also offers an example of striking incongruity.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment