photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty: Controlling perspective with the wideangle lens > Buddha Image, Vientiane, Laos, 2005
previous | next
23-JAN-2005

Buddha Image, Vientiane, Laos, 2005

By getting down low, moving in, and shooting up with a 24mm wideangle lens, I tried to create a tremendous feeling of authority. Since Buddha represents divinity, and divinity is another form of authority, this effect is appropriate. Once again, this is a three-layer image. The statue, or “image” as it is called in Laos, dominates my foreground layer. But the middle ground layer – a flowing decorative golden panel rising towards heaven, is equally important. Because of this low, close angle, and the distorting optics of the wideangle lens, the ribbon is much wider at the bottom than at the tip. Because of this, it seems to rises toward “heaven,” and as it does it seems to carve an illuminated path through the background layer of darkness. Buddha, the subject, stabilizes the photograph and gives it its identity. But the golden path cutting through darkness on the way to heaven adds critical context for meaning. Without it, it would just be another statue picture.

Canon PowerShot G6
1/400s f/4.0 at 7.2mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis19-Jul-2006 23:22
I beg to disagree, Han. My low vantage point fed Napoleons ego. Here, my low vantage enhances the esteem of a divinity and establishes a sense of authority. As Celia Lim points out below, the low angle of view with the wideangle lens "creates an effect that expresses status and importance that anyone understands, even if nobody knew what or who Buddha was. The enhanced perspective causes the pillar and the walls behind to look even taller. As our eyes follow the column upwards, we feel like we are ascending too, which are feelings that help to express ideas about divinity and enlightenment."
Guest 19-Jul-2006 14:54
this is a good angle to shoot Napolean, but not at all a buddha
Phil Douglis07-Mar-2005 00:43
Never give up what you believe in your heart, Dandan. On the other hand, if the reasons that Celia and I have expressed make good sense, and if you can appreciate their value to expression, I welcome your change of mind.
Guest 06-Mar-2005 08:39
Ok, I am giving up. :) Even though spiritually I wanted to see Buddha to be centered, but a larger dark background does help to bring more meaning to this image. And the power of the Buddha won’t look like to be limited as well…
Phil Douglis05-Mar-2005 17:36
Thanks, Celia, for adding your lucid voice to this image. I will pass this link on to Dandan. She wanted so much to center Buddha by cropping it, yet I felt the off center placement and the elements on the left side were essential to the upward thrust of this image. I welcome your own analysis of this image, particularly your comments of soaring effect I was able to bring this image by including the skewed angles and walls and shadows on the left -- the part that Dandan suggested we cut out in order to balance the Buddha in the center. I think she can learn a lot from what you have said here -- and she is a great learner! The wideangle lens is a remarkable perspective changer, but you have to use it consciously and carefully and have a good reason for everything you do with it. I made my choices here according to the point I was expressing -- a feeling of authority.
Cecilia Lim05-Mar-2005 13:19
I've always loved the effect of wide-angle lenses because they tend to stress perspective, which increases the feeling of height and depth. And the very reason that this statue photo has become an expressive one is because you inject ideas into this image by using the effects of the wide-angle lens and your vantage point: Because of the exaggerated perspective, Buddha appears to have thrust forward - an effect that expresses status and importance that anyone understands, even if nobody knew what or who Buddha was. The enhanced perspective causes the pillar and the walls behind to look even taller. As our eyes follow the column upwards, we feel like we are ascending too, which are feelings that help to express ideas about divinity and enlightenment. I don't think it would help the image if you cropped it the way that was suggested by Dandan. I feel that the askewed angles of the walls and shadows on the left infact help to express the feeling of height. I think your composition is refreshing, as it is different from many predictable photos and postcard shots of Buddha statues. This image is very simple but Phil, you get the point across very effectively with your wide-angle lens. Well done!
Phil Douglis01-Mar-2005 01:29
Thanks, Dandan, for your well reasoned argument for centering the Buddha figure here. I have to agree with you in spirit, but the presence of the door on the left hand side of picture prevented me from framing it in the center without cutting into it. If I cut into the door, we are left with a fragment. Sometimes fragments can work. But a fragment of a door or window can be very distracting.

I would also be negating the purpose for which I made the picture and posted it in this gallery. This is an example of using the power of the wideangle lens to control perspective and stress meaning. If I cropped this image into a square, it would no longer be a wideangle image. As you describe it, a square version of this photograph might work well as an expression of Buddha's authority and divinity, yet it could no longer function as a teaching example for effective wideangle photography, which is why I made and posted this example.

I agree with you that content is always more important than form in expressive photography. In this case, however, the form -- the wideangle thrust -- becomes part of the content itself. The wideangle optics have accentuated the upward thrust of that pillar, as well as the Buddha figure, by expanding the field of view. To chop this image down into a square to center that figure would, in my view, neutralize the power of that thrust.

You have every right to imagine an image other than this one in your own mind, Dandan. That is what teaching -- and learning -- is all about. Thanks for making an excellent case for your own version of this picture. Someday when you acquire your own wideangle lens, you can make an image with it that expresses your feelings, and your ideas, in your way. I hope this experience will help you do that, and do it well.
Guest 28-Feb-2005 12:58
Phil,

For this one, I don’t totally agree with you. As you emphasized over and over in you cyber-book, contents are more important than forms. And I also understand that the reading of an image is quite personal. So I am describing here is how I feel about this image: I see the authority and divinity of Buddha is presented largely in this image; from my understanding, for Buddhism, Buddha is the center of the universe for them. Thus automatically, I would be expecting to see that Buddha is place in the center, that’s where the authority will be emphasized. Even in the reality, the highest ranking person in a meeting will always be placed to a center position. This is not only for authority, also for the respect from the others.

That’s why I suggested to crop out the structure at the left (which I mean the spire-like structure attaché the wall), which allows you still keep the majority part of the door and most of the little slats of lighting on the wall while placing Buddha at the center. Does this create a static square format? Yes. But it’s not boring to me at all, since it emphasizes the meaning of Buddhism; the form is less important then.

Again, interpretation of an expressive image is based on personal experiences, as you explained in your cyber-book. As a photographer, you presented an image that triggers people’s thoughts; your job is well done then. For others, how they want to see and how they want the image to be, it can only be imagined, wished for, or evaluated in their own mind… in this case, in my mind… :)
Phil Douglis28-Feb-2005 05:37
Zandra -- it is no surprise that both you and Dandan were drawn to this image. Both of you have come, more and more to appreciate the space-shifting qualities of the wideangle lens. And both you and Dandan made cropping suggestions as well. Dandan wanted to center the image by removing some structures on the left but that would have made the image static and destroyed the integrity of the important doorway under the Buddha's hand. You want to crop a trace off the top so that the pillar seems to go on forever. I love that suggestion, and when you see this image, it will be just as you wished. I should have seen that myself. Thanks so much, Zandra for not only suggesting it but telling us why you would crop it in his way. Incidentally, perimeter cropping or trimming is usually no problem. It is only when you start actually chopping into a picture that cropping can disrupt or even destroy composition.

Both you and Dandan noticed the authority and divinity symbolized here, which is inherent in the sculpture itself, and stressed mightily by my low down, close in, upward aiming vantage point using a 24mm wideangle lens that bends an image in at the edges and exaggerates the rate at which the size of background information recedes.

Thank you for making the cropping suggestion (really just a tiny trim). It truly does intensify the meaning of the picture by implying a level of spirituality without limits. I have taught editing and cropping to professionals for 35 years but even I overlook obvious ways to improve my images through cropping them a bit, probably because I am too close to the image myself. Photographers often make poor editors of their own work. They lack the objectivity needed to see their work as others see it. I am both a photographer and a photo-editor as well as teacher of both, so you can see the difficulty I face. Thank you for your wonderful suggestion, Zandra.
Phil Douglis28-Feb-2005 02:54
Dandan, there is not just one structure on the left in the background here. There are three, each one soaring higher than the other. There is a column at upper left hand corner, a duplicate of the one that is behind the Buddha; a spire-like structure attached the wall at the bottom left hand edge; and a doorway into the temple behind the Buddha's hand. It would be impossible to crop out any of these without affecting all three as well as the Buddha. Cropping out any of them would also remove some of the wonderful little slats of light hitting the wall above that doorway. Even if I could, I would not have wanted a boring, static, centered image here. To me, off center placement is usually more dynamic and adds a sense of energy to the picture. It is one reason why I always used camera formats with rectangular frames -- they offer a greater potential for dynamic composition than a square format.
Guest 27-Feb-2005 20:34
This is one of those pictures that tells me why i just love teh wide angle lences. Looking at this, with your use of a wide angle view, as well as your view point (that should not be forgotten) the Budha becomes so much more impressive then a straight up frontal view with a 50-70 mm lence would have done. This shows power and divinity. I would have cropped just a mm at the top Phil, to have the golden pelar become lost outside the frame. For me, this pelar becomes like a high way to higher levels of spirituality and as such i don't want to see it's ending. Budha is the divinity and ther is no end to his wisdom which floats out to him and makes us look up to seek for the same wisdom. Not sure if all that made sence, but if not, then i will blame my fever. Tre and crop that mm off and tell me what you think of it. it is just a very litle thing and it may not mae any difference at all for you, or it does. Sometimes it is the simplest of things. I htink i will come back to this one. I need to think more about it. It has a lot of meaning.
Guest 27-Feb-2005 11:12
Phil, this image definite shows the authority and divinity of Buddha.
But if you crop out the structure on the left at the background, so that Buddha would be placed right on at the centre of the image; it would emphasis more of the authority and still keep the dark background layer. Does this suggestion make sense to you?
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment