photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Eighteen: Light and Landscape – combining personal vision with nature’s gifts > Sunset, Half Dome, Yosemite National Park, California, 2004
previous | next
15-OCT-2004

Sunset, Half Dome, Yosemite National Park, California, 2004

Perhaps the most memorable single moment of our visit to Yosemite came as we watched the setting sun turn the massive open face of its most famous landmark into a flaming orange slab of granite. I photographed it through the branches of an old Oak, connecting the living park with the park of legend. The Oak branches and my tight framing abstract Half Dome, suggesting its huge scale and forbidding nature instead actually showing it. I made numerous other images showing all of Half-Dome in this exquisite light, and they simply could not compare in terms of their ability to tell a story. Although the light in them was just as beautiful as in this shot, they were merely very attractive descriptions of an American icon. By covering Half Dome’s face with this screen of Oak leaves and branches, I give the image a sense of depth and also contrast the living Yosemite to the ancient granite that has always been dead, yet lives on in our dreams as a flaming orange slab of history.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20
1/100s f/2.8 at 15.0mm iso80 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
previous | next
share
Phil Douglis20-Aug-2005 18:45
Thanks, Celia, for this eloquent comment. You said something here that is very important to me, and to my teaching. Framing a subject for visual impact alone is an exercise in form. That kind of thinking creates a "level two" image, an exercise in aesthetics, but not as expression. I used the contrasting scale and symbol of those leaves here not as exercise in form for its own sake. I used it to express the very ideas you have mentioned here - to draw a comparison between the relative permanence of Half Dome and the transitory nature of the leaves. Both are products of nature. One lingers for millions of years, while the other fades and dies within a single season. Such are the cycles of life itself. Nature endures and fades simultaneously.
Cecilia Lim20-Aug-2005 13:47
You are so right Phil. Contrasting and framing Half Dome with the oak leaves made THE difference here. I think the sense of its size and its greatness comes from your comparison of Half Dome to the tiny oak leaves and dry branches which we all know will some day die and rot away -- While this beautiful glowing rock will stand the test of time and outlive many generations of living species around it. Even the colours effectively communicate the differences here: the black silhouette in the trees suggest death and doom, while the orange suggest heat and life. By creating layers with leaves infront of this great rock, you give us depth and this puts Half Dome farther away - further intensifying the sense of Half Dome being "untouchable" or unaffectable. Most people use trees to frame their subject for visual impact, but here you do it to create impact on meaning and emotion by comparison. What a wonderful expression of Half Dome's resilience, grandeur and beauty Phil!
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment