photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Linda A | all galleries >> Galleries >> Every Day I Write My Book - 2004 diary > 13th March 2004 - not a blade of grass to be seen...
previous | next
13-MAR-2004

13th March 2004 - not a blade of grass to be seen...

In order to make sure it’s US who get to eat the veggies from our garden, there are four fat-bottomed girls who need to be prevented from getting there first! We set off this morning to buy some fencing so we can keep the hens from decimating our crops now they are completely free-ranging on our garden and no longer confined to their yard.

We went to Reading, a big-ish town about fifteen miles away from home for the first time in many months. It’s a crowded place already, in fact so crowded that to drive around the town takes longer than walking because of traffic congestion, there are queues that last for half an hour or more to get into the car parks (and considering you need to pay for the car parking there in either blood or gold, that demonstrates just how many people there are who want to be there). The population suffers more and more from progressive lung disorders such as COPD through breathing in the pollution of an already too crowded place.

Despite its already overpopulated and overcrowded streets, there is so much ‘development’ work going on. The horizon is littered with cranes, building more offices and more houses and more car parking and more streets. I can’t see how that will help. Most of the new offices stand empty. In fact, the government are trying to encourage companies to develop new ways of working where people don’t have to travel so much and can work at home. To my naïve mind that means we should need fewer offices not more. Most of them are in locations that are not served by public transport so even more cars will soon be clogging up the streets.

I can’t understand how we’ve come to a time when houses are regarded as disposable in the same way as a pair of shoes. Someone moves out of a house, it gets flattened and a new one built. People don’t seem to want houses that have been lived in. Why not? In the ugly new developments there is little for the young to do – they stand around on street corners and make mischief. Two couples we know have been forced to move because of crowds of children and adolescents hanging around their homes because they bought houses on new developments where there is nothing to do and so the kids simply spent their time making a misery of the lives of our friends. At least in older areas there was some consideration given to social space.

For me, I know that one of the reasons I wanted to live in this house was its history. I love the fact that other couples before us have raised their families here – I even love the fact the last but one owners died here. Their spirits watch over us and keep us from harm. They guide me in the décor and welcome me home at night.

That may sound like claptrap to some but I argue strongly that whether or not you believe in benign spirits, their choices of windows, doors, décor, garden and all the rest are an integral part of what I love here. To me, the ancient Azalea in the front garden with its heady scent, planted long, long ago by another family is a good reason to be here. I put my key in my lock and breathe it in and it’s intoxicating and liberating. That’s all lost when the bulldozers drive in. I wonder why others can’t see the beauty of old and insist on their own virgin magnolia walls that no-one before them have painted or papered.

‘Development’ isn’t always good – why waste our precious, scarce resource on offices that no-one wants and houses that people fight over because of their newness? Our little excursion to buy a fence has filled me with anger and gloom for the future of the South East.

Canon PowerShot G3
1/1000s f/8.0 at 28.8mm full exif

other sizes: small medium original auto
share
Mike R16-Mar-2004 16:02
We live four miles from Reading town centre. We have options for getting there - car, bus, train (and 20 min walk) or walk all the way. We have found that the car is the slowest option unless we leave at 8AM on Saturday. We actually walk all the way now, it takes around an hour, let's us see all the things going on in our community, allows time to talk and laugh and keeps us fit (which I really should start turning my attention to!).
Guest 15-Mar-2004 10:59
I love the idea of an old house, but the reality is somewhat different for me! We moved to a brand new townhouse 6 years ago from a brand new flat we had lived in for 7 years. The reason being that we are not DIY inclined, and we had to scrape the pot of money to buy each home we have lived in. We decided that we would rather live with builders' dust than other people's filth and bad taste in decor!

When we were teenagers Mum and Dad bought our first home, and it was completely disgusting. I have very vivid memories of living in a horrid building site for 7 years while Dad rewired, re-plumbed, installed central heating, re-fitted the DISGUSTING kitchen, boxed in the exposed soil pipe (that went down the middle of our house because the previous owner had built an extention and couldn't be bothered to move it), and generally decorated and made our house a lovely home. It took 7 years to get there, and what did they do? SOLD IT and moved to another disgusting house, having to start all over again! We would love an old house, but it will be when we can afford to pay someone to sort it out before we move in!!!
brother_mark14-Mar-2004 23:24
"Methinks the lady doth protest too much." ;)

Here in Washington things are not as old as in Europe. This city was really only settled in the 1790s. My building is 91 years old. The others on the block probably about the same. Being in the "historic district" developers have trouble getting permission to tear down a shotgun shack, and of course, we must replace our windows with wooden sashes and permits; doors must be historically correct....I'm not sure of the oldest house on "The Hill," maybe 1790. No "Friendship House" for homeless women was originally the main house on a farm that ran down to the water from Pennsylvania Ave., SE. Probably that was from the early part of the 18th century. Personally I prefer older homes for their "character."
Linda Alstead14-Mar-2004 21:32
Wimpey - a curse on their souls
northstar3714-Mar-2004 18:54
They discovered the site of a large Roman Army camp near here a year or so ago. Possibly from the time of Agricola, and maybe a base for the Romans during the battle of Mons Graupius. I noticed today that Wimpey are building houses on it :-(
Steve Barney 14-Mar-2004 15:46
Linda, that's the nicest compliment I've ever received. I gotten the same lift many times wandering through your PotD. Thanks!
mikiruaq14-Mar-2004 02:24
There is always something new going up here in our town. Instead of using existing empty buildings, they stay vacant and the companies coming up here build there own new buildings. We sold our house in Portland, OR before coming here and it was almost 100 years old and situated on a corner. The guy who bought it torn it down and built 2 houses. Sad but true in today's society :(
gary becker13-Mar-2004 19:38
Here in Dallas, TX a house is old after 20 years. I remodeled a 100 year old home in Seattle for a guy from England who would often describe the 400 year old home he'd lived in there. It was fascinating what appealed to him... walls roughly patched and loaded with endless layers of paint (he was appalled by our fetish for finishing walls perfectly smooth). My fondest memories of my visits to Europe while in the Navy, oh so long ago, was the sense of antiquity. None of that here.

BTW, cool photo.
Linda Alstead13-Mar-2004 17:44
I'm less mad now - listening to Steve Barney's wonderful CD has lifted my spirits!
Ray :)13-Mar-2004 17:02
Fair enough, you went to buy some fencing, but I imagine many of your neighbours still DRIVE into Reading just to buy a new frock or whatever, even though there is a direct train service. I have the same problem in getting to Guildford. Going there by car is absolutely pointless - I nearly always take the train.
I am in full support of what you say of making the best use of older homes, although to me, the fact that somebody died there previously, is not a particular bonus!
Chris Brooker13-Mar-2004 17:01
I think cranes are very clever and interesting machines but I wouldn’t have a new house if you paid me.

So thank you for the cranes and the blue sky, and thank God? for the green belt.

I see that on the edge of St. Albans they have bought some fields and are selling plots just in case the rules are relaxed. I wish a plague on them.