photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery One: Travel Abstractions -- Unlimited Thought > Neruda, La Sebastiana, Valparaiso, Chile, 2003
previous | next
29-DEC-2003

Neruda, La Sebastiana, Valparaiso, Chile, 2003

Although I was not allowed to photographically search for the spirit of Chile’s Nobel Prize winning poet Pablo Neruda inside of his incredible La Sebastiana home, I was free to search for it outside the house. A curving bench made out of copper overlooks the home's lush gardens. At one end of the bench, Neruda himself still sits, only as a copper silhouette. I shot the silhouette in shadow, making his presence almost palpable. What makes this picture work is the illusion created by abstraction. At first glance, we can’t tell if we are looking at person or not. A closer look tells us it’s not -- a very thin trail of light on the back of the neck and shoulder gives the game away. It is the interplay between illusion and reality that makes this image resonate.

Canon PowerShot G5
1/640s f/4.0 at 17.6mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis11-Aug-2007 21:45
Thanks, Dogus -- I have seen "Il Postino" - a wonderful film. And yes, this image has surprised a number of people. That was my intention.
Guest 11-Aug-2007 21:30
Until I read the last two sentence of your explanation, Phil, I was thinking "Year 2003, Pablo Neruda sitting down there? Copper? What?" :) Really a great illusion!

Meanwhile, if you have not done so already, I suggest you to see the movie " Il Postino " in which you can see scenes describing inside his house.
Phil Douglis14-Dec-2004 22:43
You put your finger on it here, Mikel. Abstraction does play with the mind. It leaves out just enough to suggest meaning but not reveal it. It leaves the rest up to our imagination.
Guest 14-Dec-2004 22:28
I'ts very clever to use the thin light line. I like that idea though if you wold have not told me about it on the text I wold have thought that it whas any normal person sitting down in a park, curious how sometimes it plays with your mind this abstraction thing. ;)
Guest 01-Dec-2004 17:43
you fully got the spirit of Neruda, wonderful.
Phil Douglis09-Nov-2004 05:37
It makes me feel good when you tell me you "get it." You are a very intelligent person, Nut, but photographic expression is a new language for you to learn, and sometimes it might take a while for a lesson to sink in. But when Nut tells me she's got it, she's got it!
nut 09-Nov-2004 04:36
I got it.
Phil Douglis29-Oct-2004 21:59
It is an illusion, Nut. Neruda was real, of course. Now he is dead. But his spirit lives on in this flat sculpture of him. I deliberately made my picture of this flat sculpture to ask the question "Is he still with us?" And by implication, yes, he always will be, because his poetry will live as long as there are people to read it.
nut 29-Oct-2004 18:20

I think he's a real person...great, how come?
Phil Douglis05-Oct-2004 17:11
Glad to get your mind out of its box, Jen. You were looking at the picture before only in terms of aesthetics, and now you are looking at it terms of meaning, so everything changes, right?

You make a wonderful point about the bushes, a point I had not considered myself. They are just like us -- they will die, and new ones will grow in their place. They are immortal. But Neruda's words will never die as long as people can read them.

I think this image still asks questions and demands answers from us about the concept of immortality. is it real or is it an illusion, such as i have offered you here in this image?
Jennifer Zhou05-Oct-2004 10:25
Once I came to learn your intention of making this picture---"questioning immortality", my mind jumped right out from that little box I was in before..The whole idea takes me into this picture and I really see it in a now light..Thanks for your wonderful explanation here, Phil!!

And your tight framing doesn't seem to bother anymore, there is just right space for Neruda emergeing in to the bushes, and questioning us what's immortality...

On my second thought though, these bushes will not live forever right? They all look about the same, but everyone of them are different lives, and they live, die just like us, don't they? Or you just take these bushes as a metaphor for a immortal life?


Jen
Phil Douglis04-Oct-2004 17:18
Thanks, Jen, for your comments and excellent questions. You grasped the incongruous basis of the picture, but still question the human values this image projects. To me, this image asks us to consider that nature of immortality -- whch is certainly a human value, right? Neruda himself is dead, but his poetry keeps him alive for many. We can't see his poetry here, but we do see his two-dimensional presence in this garden of living plants. The illusion of life is there, the reality of the two-dimensional man tells us its not. Which raises a larger question, Jen. Is immortality itself real, or is it an illusion? I want my image to raise this question in those who take the time to ponder the meaning of this picture. Does this help you answer your question? Now tell me what you think of this picture.

And yes, you are right about the backlight as the key to the illusion. It does, as you say so well, bring energy and life to this image. It was a flat, gray sky, and I metered on the sky to make this figure become a silhouette. You can't see its color, and silhouettes lose their form, and retain only their shape. Do you really want to see more sky behind the actual silhouette to make that shape jump out at you, Jen? If so, I strongly disagree with you on that point. I wanted the silhouette to emerge from the bushes, which represent life. I love the very subtle thin rim light on the edge of the metal, that defines the shape of the sculpture and gives it just a trace of dimensionality (form). If I had changed my vantage point fill the space behind the silhouette with sky (backlight) all of that would have been lost.

Let me know you thoughts on my comment, Jen. I am always delighted with your comments and most of all, your criticisms and questions. That's the way to keep both of us learning. Thanks.
Phil
Jennifer Zhou04-Oct-2004 12:07
I am charmed by this "illusion and reality" concept you brought here in this picture! Great abstraction and incongruity between the lifeless silhouette and the flourish plants, but what kind of human value you want to express here? Wisdom? Persistence? It's not very obvious to me..

I especially like the backlight which betraied that charming illusion but brought energy and life to this picture. However, my mind kind of been tied up in a box by the way you composed it; there is very little space behind the silhouette(where I think the backlight should be more emphasized)..

Jen
Phil Douglis26-Apr-2004 20:24
Thanks for being the first to comment on this image, Jill. I am glad you were taken with it -- it is one of those pictures that requires, I think, some context and work on the part of the viewer.
Phil
Jill26-Apr-2004 20:00
Captivating.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment