photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
jCross | all galleries >> What I Did Today >> What I did Today 2019 > November 18, 2019
previous | next
18-Nov-2019 jCross

November 18, 2019

191118_0001P.jpg


So I went out to the range today to conduct my experiment. A few days back I mentioned I segregated the brass that gave high and low velocities in an effort to see if differences in the brass could account for the terrible muzzle velocity results. As I started shooting over the chronometer, the same old random results started to appear. Boy was I disappointed!

The one thing in the back of my mind was that the powder load on the shells was about 85% of capacity. Maybe the distribution of the powder in the shell when fired had an effect. So I started tapping the cartridge on the bench to settle the powder, inserted it into the chamber with the rifle held vertically, then slowly lowered it to horizontal and made the shot. I was stunned. The velocities settled down and I got several very acceptable strings with low muzzle velocity variability.

As a final touch I had loaded some with a larger powder charge that completely filled the case. I fired all of these without any specialized handling and got nice, consistent muzzle velocity data (2087 fps average, spread 48, standard deviation 11). Looks like I have solved the mystery, and had a lot of fun in the process.

Canon PowerShot G5 X
1/640s f/8.0 at 33.6mm iso125 full exif

other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
John Cooper29-Nov-2019 23:43
John, you will notice that in all commercial ammunition the powder always fills the case to the base of the bullet.
Rifle shooters here use an inert filler to fill the air gap in their reloads.
I forget what they use, might be rice or something similar.
This is only if they cannot find a powder load that fills the case.