photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
FrankB | all galleries >> Frank's Corner >> Filmworks >> Knickknacks > comparison
previous | next
FrankB

comparison

I took this previously with my digital camera and this is the film take with two vintage cameras, my Leica M3 and my Nikon F2......I don't know how important equipment differences are...I suspect not a lot. Certainly not as much as people seem to be willing to come to blows over in the blogs. Not when 30 and 50 year old lenses can do this. Leica shot on Portra 160; Nikon on Portra 400


other sizes: small medium large original auto
previous | next
Paolo Peggi (aka Bracciodiferro)18-May-2019 12:01
Leica sound much better to me.But it so difficult to compare 20mm vs 90mm,IMO. V
Paolo
Walter Otto Koenig10-May-2019 15:42
Agree with Tom's comment Frank. Way too much quibbling about the minute differences about equipment. When they start arguing about the difference of one or two shots per second in burst mode, I am no longer interested. You can't buy a good eye! :) "V"
Tom LeRoy10-May-2019 15:07
I agree 100%, both images are superb in their own special way. The Leica shot knocks it out of the park! BV