No Monthly Fee Debit Card

See the red book--The Dismal Science--black guy has a copy of The Dismal Science, which is what the famous author, Charles Dickens, and John Ruskin, called the economics of John Stuart Mill, because it was GOOD news for all of the poor including black people--Dickens and Ruskin were racists.

Chattel slavery and genocide against the Irish were turned from evil to good by the new light of economic darwinism, under new labels such as Eugenics and new memes such as Trickledown.

The aim of propaganda was to charter pirates in king's charter monopolies and continuing empire and colonialism. Another author, Harriet Beecher Stowe, like Dickens seeming to have sympathy for the suffering poor, had no such sympathy when because of her superstition in neolibcon economics, she said that the Scottish Clearances were "inevitable", and not land theft by genocide.

Richard Neylon, used book seller: RUSKIN, John. John Ruskin on Himself and Things in General. Liverpool, Cope's Tobacco Plant 1893. Octavo publisher's illustrated wrapper; 64pp, including some adverts. A nice unopened copy. Cope's Smoke Room Booklets No.13. Au$175

A wonderful cover image by John Wallace that manages to appoint Ruskin to the racist image cadre, offend economists if anyone cares, and puzzle the rest of us. Why is the slaughtered figure clutching the "Wealth of Nations" sack and carrying the book 'The Dismal Science', black? After posing the same question David Levy and Sandra Peart in 'The Secret History of the Dismal Science' lead us straight to Carlyle and the paragraph in which he coined the term: "Exeter Hall Philanthropy and the Dismal Science, led by any sacred cause of Black Emancipation, or the like, to fall in love and make a wedding of it, —will give birth to progenies and prodigies; dark extensive moon-calves, unnameable abortions, wide-coiled monstrosities". This seems to me to call for unnatural erudition on the part of the average commercial illustrator but Wallace wasn't average.

The booklet itself offended Ruskin or his publishers but it wasn't the cover, it was the unauthorised printing of his words that angered them and they mounted a successful case against the Cope Brothers for breach of copyright. If Ruskin was still aware of anything much by 1893 certainly he would have been unhappy with tobacco merchants co-opting him, devoutly anti-tobacco as he was, for marketing.

-Richard Neylon, used book seller

Richard Neylon has read Secret History of the Dismal Science, and quotes Carlyle from there, proving part of why the average commercial illustrator should have portrayed the Irish poor during the epic potato famine as a black monkey, but without fully explaining nineteenth century pseudo-anthropology of editorial cartoons basing more cartoons and further pseudo-science, a new pseudo-economics to go with previous occult and true history, upon which the best lies are begun as grains of sand to support a divided house. A book seller introduces a mystery, as to why Cromwell's Irish monkey girls must not be fed during potato famines, or that would be a crime, and that called Race Treason, as any average nineteenth century commercial illustrator would have known from the work of their superiors, the editorial cartoonists. The english knew the Irish and Scottish to be descended from Scota and Glass. That is why Oliver Cromwell's son kidnapped Irish girls and bred them with black men in Barbados and Trinidad, and sold their brown babies for quick cash. That is why Harriet Beecher Stowe said that the Scottish Clearances were deterministically Inevitable rather than unjust and cruel. Rhesus positive people with straight hair and thin lips like monkeys are always calling other people monkeys. That is just the lying and violent nature of guilt projection role reversal by the original organ grinder's vacuum-headed slave patrol monkey.

Vanity of the Philosopher by Levy and Peart