It is a composite...no questions about it, unless there is a lot of Photoshop manipulation of exposure, colors, contrast etc. It would also need a telephoto lens to obtain this effect, but the exposure of the moon and ski is quite different. One can obtain dual correct exposure of foreground and moon by simply doing a double exposure of each and then combining both in Photoshop, which is perfectly acceptable in photography.
However, there is too much Photoshop effect in many of these images. They are beautiful otherwise, but the artist should let the guests know when some of the pictures are composite vs. photography (whether they are digital vs. film).
simon davis
10-Jun-2005 03:17
Nice but is this a composite of 2 images, through Photoshop?
The faint glow around the top of the building features gives it away, I think.
What a great juxtaposition of the solitude of the moon in the evening sky and the busy chimney stacks on the uneven roof lines.
Guest
21-Sep-2002 09:54
Hello,
D'abord, chapeau pour tes photos. Vraiment du bon travail. J'aspire à devenir aussi bon un jour!
une question si tu permet: le clair de lune, c'est un montage? quelle focale pour avoir la lune comme ca? ou est-ce pris au téléscope?
Merci et continue..
