![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
filmworks4ever | profile | all galleries >> Microfilm_Testing >> tcc_archive_test | tree view | thumbnails | slideshow |
35mm
microfilm test for the Toronto Camera Club
SELECT ORIGINAL UNDER THE IMAGE TO SEE FULL RESOLUTION
IN EACH IMAGE PAIR TH SECOND HAS BEEN ENHANCE FOR TEXT
Images
starting with 35mm _silverxxxx are from a different source and I added these to
see the results from an old newspaper page (not too promising) and some 1872
type-written pages.
Sprocketless,
B&W negative
Scanned
at 5.2Mp with film scanning machine
Manually
held in place with modified slide adaptor (no, the film was not cut).
Framing
was not perfect and large white bar on the left was actually edge of device I
used to hole the frame.
Images
were processed with 12/16 bit resolution and then published -> BMP ->
jpeg.
I
did not for a heavy white black saturation as I found them easier to read in
this form.
Most,.
but not all of the frames had two pages per fame. You can see and example in
this set. Sometime notes were laid across the pages.
The
entire frame was initially stored as a raw pattern
All
of the images here were processed with a recipe, no individual adjustments were
performed.
Each
image appears twice, the second having some enhancement to bring our edges of
the text.
Generating
multiple versions of each photograph is not a problem.
Improvements
that I can make
·
Eliminating
debayering in processing, this should in theory, slightly increase resolution.
·
Feed
the film with movie film rollers as opposed to test with slide adapter – to
ensure optimum focus
·
Framing
could be improved to eliminate the white bar on the right, and focal distance
changed to cover largest possible page height.
If
you wanted your micro film digitized with this system then:
·
I
would recommend capturing each side of the frame separately, for resolution
consideration, and possibly the center of the fame.(which I would not count as
a separate page).
I
have not examined all of there film however.
·
It
is not convenient to switch focal
length on a frame by frame basis. If I set up to capture a page per side or
center, and image with fills the whote frame, would be captured in overlapping
seconds.
·
The
identification banner at the bottom of the frame appears to be there most of
the time, and I would use this for indexing. If it is absent I will have to
manually move to the next frame.
·
I
noticed all is not black and white in the microfilm world. I like the images
better as grayscale, boosting the contrast currently may result in messy parts
as the black level varies across the negative.
·
Yes
there and pens holding down pages.
Please let me know what you think of these scans and if you want to see any image processing changes tried on the test images.
john@bitworks.org
comment | share |