Wildlife Prairie State Park 2001 Photo Gallery by DeMorcan at pbase.com

photo sharing and upload

picture albums

photo forums

search pictures

popular photos

photography help

login

DeMorcan | profile | all galleries >> Wildlife Prairie State Park Galleries >> Wildlife Prairie State Park 2001

tree view | thumbnails | slideshow

Wildlife Prairie State Park 2001

Images from the park.

pages 1 2 3 ALL

next page

Fall Rain 1013.jpg	Fall Rain 2 1013.jpg	Distant Trees in Rain 1013.jpg	Proud Rack 1013.jpg
Viewing Platform 1013.jpg	Foliage in Rain 1013.jpg	Fall Leaves 1013.jpg	Bull in Fog 1013.jpg
Looking Out 1013.jpg	Fall Flight 1013.jpg	Balancing Act.jpg	Duck.jpg
Itch.jpg	Forgotten Wagon.jpg	Windmill.jpg	Prairie Home.jpg
Wooden Head.jpg	statue.jpg	foot.jpg	River Otter.jpg
plow.jpg

pages 1 2 3 ALL

next page

comment |

Guest		30-Mar-2002 18:57
I think you ROCK...Kelly is TRIPPIN! Get a tripod and keep sharpening the images. I think you are "SEEING" fine! She is the blind one ;) We use your pix here at work for backgrounds every day ;) Keep on snappin... (Not you Kelly) D

DeMorcan		29-Nov-2001 02:43
Thank you. I do agree with your comments. Early on I had a 3X very basic camera. Many of the photos were processed with the cameras program which had an instant fix that over sharpened. Now I have an image editing program, I tend to sharpen for the subject. I later got a C-2100 which did a much better job. But even with the IS, at full zoom with the B-300, there is often movement when I am holding the camera. I have improved that somewhat. The comsumer cameras in my price range do seem to have a pixelation in some colors - usually blues and shadows. And, I sure would love a pro camera and set of lens. Unfortunately, that will never be in my budget. I do hope one day to move up to a higher quality camera with improved technology. But for now, I enjoy what I have and live with limitations of the camera and myself. Again, thank you for your honest comments.

Kelly		24-Nov-2001 19:03
You've got a great eye for photography but you're somewhat inconsistent, and many images suffer from camera shake or movement on the part of the photographer. Several others appear to be suffering from "over sharpening" which also introduces a great deal of image noise. Occasionally you hit one that's extremely well done in both visualization and representation. (Often referred to as "seeing".) Your consumer digital camera is holding you back by having a lot of typical "halo" effect and noise in the blue layer as is the case with most consumer CCD imagers. A "pro" camera such as the Canon D30 would make all the difference in the world with your images. You obviously have a natural eye for it and your consistency will improve with practice. Keep up the good work!

click on thumbnails for full image