2nd Place train station by sergio rojkes by Canon DSLR Challenge

Canon DSLR Challenge | all galleries >> Canon SLR Challenges - FAQ >> CSLR - Best of... >> Best of 2006 > 2nd Place
train station
by sergio rojkes


02-JUL-2006	sergio rojkes

Canon EOS 300D Digital Rebel
1/60s f/4.5 at 14.0mm iso400 hide exif

other sizes: small medium original auto

Please do not delete, update, or otherwise edit others' entries
* Submitter retains all copyrights *

Canon DSLR Challenge		13-Jul-2006 02:29
Apparently the 300 has the same noise issues as the 10D. That's why I ended up with the 5D - you can crank the ISO up. I found with the 10D I couldn't push beyond ISO 200 unless there was tons of light, in which case I didn't need to push to ISO 200. Looks like you had enough light for the main room. I'm assuming that front area, where you were standing, was presumably much darker adn you were forced to pull up the curve there, no? Maybe you could go back with a tripod and go for a longer exposure, then you'd also get the nice motion of the people too, although I don't find a lack of motion detracting at all here. Pretty colors, nice composition. :) ~ Lonnit

Canon DSLR Challenge		07-Jul-2006 23:15
Great comp!! The optical illusion is greatly captured! -Cat

Guest		04-Jul-2006 16:28
Well done. -Michael

Canon DSLR Challenge		04-Jul-2006 14:49
GREAT square idea, and a super nice and interesting shot!

iso3200		04-Jul-2006 09:17
A perfect example of where the square composition is adding to the overall image.

jnconradie		04-Jul-2006 07:30
Compliments! (Could also have been a Leading Lines entry...) Regards ~jnconradie

Sergio Rojkes		04-Jul-2006 03:36
Thank You Victor!, I just checked it again and it seem ok, it might be a need of the eye for a perspective, it also happens to me. Ser

Victor Engel		04-Jul-2006 03:13
Very nice, but I think you should apply a bit of lens "correction", or undo a bit of the lens correction that you did apply. The walls are every so slightly farther apart at the top than at the bottom, or at least that's how they look. Since the perspective is from below, it really should be the opposite, in my opinion. I think a lens correction of vertical perspective of 3-4% would be about right. Just my humble opinion, of course. -- Victor