photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Canon DSLR Challenge | all galleries >> Challenge 62: Low light or low key (hosts: Victor Engel & Olaf.dk) >> Eligible > Weiskei's Dream
by Michael Soo
previous | next
27-FEB-2006 Michael Soo

Weiskei's Dream
by Michael Soo

California

First of all, I have to deeply apologize for leaving a watermark on this image. I typically don't but I am kinda proud of this work that it would be unwise for me to leave it here without.

Secondly, I'm sure there'll be questions like "Did you use photoshop?" Well, I wish I can say I didn't. But there were too many godamn dust on the plexiglass that I had to use Photoshop to
clone 'em out!!! It was frustrating... That's probably why jewelry photography has came down to actually photoshopping the entire rings and diamonds as dust become much more apparent in macro situations. Also cloned out some small unwanted reflections. When was the last time we all did some "painting with light" and didn't accidentally leave in unwanted reflections, right? Beyond that, just some curves. No, I didn't change the background or alter the image. As for how I did this, haha! ;-)

- Michael Soo

Canon EOS 20D ,Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
15s f/16.0 at 45.0mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium original auto
share
Canon DSLR Challenge02-Mar-2006 18:20
Really cool work Michael. As Cindi said ... you DO have patience :) -Cat
Canon DSLR Challenge01-Mar-2006 00:35
Michael, For a painted picture, the EV is correct if you consider the average light over the time of the exposure. The brightness of the light produced by the light source, though, is brighter than that given by the calculator. Look at it this way. It's bright enough that it averages with darkness to produce an average of what the calculator indicates. -- Victor
Canon DSLR Challenge28-Feb-2006 19:09
Impressive work - you DO have patience! ;) Cindy
Guest 28-Feb-2006 18:39
Hey Olaf. No, I'd love to check out Metalized Mylar. Where do I buy those?
Anyways, I know exactly what you mean by the mirror. Yes, you get double
reflections which is very annoying. This surface is black acrylic. You
can buy it for $1 in most plastic store.

I'm trying to do this as a combination of a quad image; the rainbow, the
butterfly, the "diamond" and reflections (on the surface and the diamond
itself) & shadow (wingtip of the butterfly). Took over 200 shots to get
it right.

- Michael Soo
Guest 28-Feb-2006 18:27
Perhaps you will share one little detail? The reflective surface, is it metalized mylar? I've used a mirror in the past, but the reflective coating is on the back of the glass and hence you very easily get two reflections - one in the upper surface of the glass and the other in the reflective coating underneath. I've been thinking of metalized mylar as an alternative, but I don't know where I would be able to get that and in how big pieces? I also wonder if it would be stiff and flat enough?

As for the photograph - it sure is spectacular! Seen as a product shot, one could argue that the diamond is over-powered by all the effects (spectrum-effects plus butterfly with florescent coloring).
Guest 28-Feb-2006 08:34
Based on Victor's EV calculator, this is EV 4.1 but I think it is
much much lower due to the fact that this is light painting in complete
darkness... So, for that I'm not sure how to calculate...Olaf/Victor can
probably help.

- Michael Soo