photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
914-6 GT | profile | all galleries >> NP - The 914-6 GT Project >> NP 2.8 RSR Twin-Plug Race Engine #1 >> Early 911 2.0 Liter Aluminum Crankcase to 911 RSR Crankcase Conversion Project >> Early 2.0 Liter to 3.0 Liter RSR Crankcase Comparison... tree view | thumbnails | slideshow

Early 2.0 Liter to 3.0 Liter RSR Crankcase Comparison...

ENGINE TYPE: 901/05 (5032?) https://pbase.com/image/28169295

SERIAL: 908164 https://pbase.com/image/28169293

Take a quick look at some of the differences between the "Early 2.0 Liter Sandcast Aluminum Crankcase" and the much more stronger "Late 911 RSR 3.0 liter Sandcast Aluminum Crankcase". You may also want to pay attention to the photo's description which may provide additional comments and information.
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 1
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 1		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 2
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 2		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 3
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 3		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 4
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 4		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 5
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 5		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 6
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 6
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 7
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 7		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 8
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 8		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 9
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 9		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 10
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 10		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 11
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 11		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 12
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 12
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 13
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 13		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 14
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 14		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 15
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 15		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 16
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 16		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 17
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 17		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 18
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 18
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 19
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 19		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 20
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 20		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 21
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 21		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 22
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 22		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 23
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 23		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 24
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 24
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 25
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 25		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 26
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 26		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 27
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 27		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 28
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 28		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 29
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 29		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 30
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 30
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 31
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 31		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 32
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 32		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 33
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 33		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 34
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 34		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 35
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 35		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 36
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 36
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 37
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 37		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 38
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 38		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 39
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 39		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 40
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 40		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 41
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 41		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 42
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 42
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 43
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 43		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 44
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 44		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 45
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 45		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 46
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 46		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 47
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 47		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 48
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 48
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 49
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 49		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 50
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 50		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 51
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 51		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 52
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 52		 Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 53
Early 2.0 Liter and RSR 3.0 Liter Sandcast Alloy Crankcase Comparison - Photo 53

comment | share
click on thumbnails for full image